Nativist but not alienated
Nativist but not alienated
复制标题
本土主义者但不疏远
DOI：
10.1177/1354068813511379
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
K. Zhirkov
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Zhirkov
在本研究中，我使用大规模的调查数据，比较激进的权利投票，在西欧的其他形式的选举行为。所选择的方法，多层次多项式逻辑回归，允许，第一，区分几个政党家庭的投票，以及预防，第二，控制国家和调查轮之间的差异。我发现，激进右翼选民的特点不是社会异化或反现代价值观;这些特征更有可能在那些放弃选举的人中遇到。激进右翼投票最强烈的动机是政治态度，即对移民的负面看法，政治不信任，反对收入再分配，以及-出乎意料的-政治满意度。我的分析还表明，不同西欧国家的激进右翼政党吸引了具有相似意识形态取向的选民，这些选民随着时间的推移保持相对稳定。在结论中，我讨论了我的研究结果对激进右翼政党家庭的比较研究的影响。
In the present study I use large-scale survey data to compare radical right voting to other forms of electoral behavior in Western Europe. The chosen method, multilevel multinomial logistic regression, allows, first, distinguishing among voting for several party families as well as abstention and, second, controlling for differences between countries and survey rounds. I find that the radical right electorate is not characterized by social alienation or anti-modern values; these characteristics are more likely to be encountered among people who abstain from elections. Radical right voting is most strongly motivated by political attitudes, namely by negative perception of immigration, political mistrust, opposition to income redistribution, and – rather unexpectedly – political satisfaction. My analysis also shows that radical right parties in different West European countries attract voters with similar ideological orientations which remain relatively stable over time. In the conclusion I discuss the implications of my findings for comparative research on the radical right party family.