Evaluation of Spatially Targeted Scleral Stiffening on Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Glaucoma.
Evaluation of Spatially Targeted Scleral Stiffening on Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Glaucoma.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1167/tvst.11.5.7
复制
发表时间:
2022-05-02
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Ethier, C. Ross
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gerberich, Brandon G.;Hannon, Bailey G.;Brown, Dillon M.;Read, A. Thomas;Ritch, Matthew D.;Echeverri, Elisa Schrader;Nichols, Lauren;Potnis, Cahil;Sridhar, Sreesh;Toothman, Maya G.;Schwaner, Stephen A.;Winger, Erin J.;Huang, Hannah;Gershon, Gabby S.;Feola, Andrew J.;Pardue, Machelle T.;Prausnitz, Mark R.;Ethier, C. Ross
Scleral stiffening may protect against glaucomatous retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss or dysfunction associated with ocular hypertension. Here, we assess the potential neuroprotective effects of two treatments designed to stiffen either the entire posterior sclera or only the sclera adjacent to the peripapillary sclera in an experimental model of glaucoma. Rat sclerae were stiffened in vivo using either genipin (crosslinking the entire posterior sclera) or a regionally selective photosensitizer, methylene blue (stiffening only the juxtaperipapillary region surrounding the optic nerve). Ocular hypertension was induced using magnetic microbeads delivered to the anterior chamber. Morphological and functional outcomes, including optic nerve axon count and appearance, retinal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography, optomotor response, and electroretinography traces, were assessed. Both local (juxtaperipapillary) and global (whole posterior) scleral stiffening treatments were successful at increasing scleral stiffness, but neither provided demonstrable neuroprotection in hypertensive eyes as assessed by RGC axon counts and appearance, optomotor response, or electroretinography. There was a weak indication that scleral crosslinking protected against retinal thinning as assessed by optical coherence tomography. Scleral stiffening was not demonstrated to be neuroprotective in ocular hypertensive rats. We hypothesize that the absence of benefit may in part be due to RGC loss associated with the scleral stiffening agents themselves (mild in the case of genipin, and moderate in the case of methylene blue), negating any potential benefit of scleral stiffening. The development of scleral stiffening as a neuroprotective treatment will require the identification of better tolerated stiffening protocols and further preclinical testing.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Guo L;Moss SE;Alexander RA;Ali RR;Fitzke FW;Cordeiro MF
通讯作者:
Cordeiro MF
影响因子:
14
作者:
Gerberich BG;Hannon BG;Hejri A;Winger EJ;Schrader Echeverri E;Nichols LM;Gersch HG;MacLeod NA;Gupta S;Read AT;Ritch MD;Sridhar S;Toothman MG;Gershon GS;Schwaner SA;Sánchez-Rodríguez G;Goyal V;Toporek AM;Feola AJ;Grossniklaus HE;Pardue MT;Ethier CR;Prausnitz MR
通讯作者:
Prausnitz MR
影响因子:
13.7
作者:
Burgoyne, CF;Quigley, HA;Varma, R
通讯作者:
Varma, R
影响因子:
5.5
作者:
Bui, BV;Fortune, B
通讯作者:
Fortune, B
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Chauhan, BC;LeVatte, TL;Archibald, ML
通讯作者:
Archibald, ML