Boundaries of Belonging - Localities, Citizenship and Rights in India and Pakistan

Boundaries of Belonging - Localities, Citizenship and Rights in India and Pakistan
复制标题

归属的界限——印度和巴基斯坦的地域、公民身份和权利

DOI:
10.1017/9781108164511
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ansari S
Ansari S
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ansari S

文献摘要

相似文献

1947年的分治在接下来的几十年里对印度和巴基斯坦的公民身份和权利问题产生了重大影响。《归属的界限》通过将人们的注意力从南亚的分治热点--孟加拉和旁遮普--转移到分治的北方邦和信德邦的腹地,展示了公民身份在政治转型时期是如何演变的,以及这对普通人意味着什么。在丰富的档案研究和田野调查的基础上,分析了两地“公民”的共性、差异和相互共建。它还揭示了跨越边界的事态发展,如社区暴力,可能直接影响其邻国的少数群体权利。萨拉·安萨里和威廉·古尔德质疑人们对日益“专制”的巴基斯坦和“民主”的印度的刻板印象,他们对最近的学术研究做出了重大贡献,认为印度和巴基斯坦之间的差异被夸大了。
The 1947 Partition had a major impact on issues of citizenship and rights in India and Pakistan in the decades that followed. Boundaries of Belonging shows how citizenship evolves at a time of political transition and what this meant for ordinary people, by directing attention away from South Asia's Partition'hotspots'-Bengal and Punjab-to Partition's' hinterlands' of Uttar Pradesh and Sindh. The analysis, based on rich archival research and fieldwork, brings out commonalities, differences, and the mutual co-construction of the'citizen'in both places. It also reveals the way in which developments across the border, such as communal violence, could directly impact on minority rights in its neighbour. Questioning stereotypes of an increasingly'authoritarian'Pakistan and'democratic'India, Sarah Ansari and William Gould make a major contribution to recent scholarship that suggests the differences between India and Pakistan are overstated.