When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness.

When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness.
复制标题

什么时候物以类聚,物以类聚,什么时候不聚:地位构成、社会统治取向和组织吸引力。

DOI:
10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.396
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
The Journal of applied psychology
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. B. Watkins
M. B. Watkins
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Elizabeth E. Umphress;Kristin Smith;A. Brief;J. Dietz;M. B. Watkins

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

虽然相似性吸引的概念表明相似性-例如,在价值观,个性和人口统计学方面-吸引,但作者发现有时人口统计学相似性吸引,有时它排斥。与社会支配理论(J. Sidanius & F. Pratto,1999年),他们在3项研究中证明,当未来的员工支持基于群体的社会等级制度(即,社会支配倾向高),高地位群体中的人被组织内的人口统计相似性所吸引,而低地位群体的人则对此感到排斥。这一发现的一个重要理论含义是,社会支配理论和传统的相似性-吸引力概念一起有助于解释人口统计相似性和吸引力之间的关系比以前在组织中承认的更复杂。文学
Although similarity-attraction notions suggest that similarity--for example, in terms of values, personality, and demography--attracts, the authors found that sometimes demographic similarity attracts and sometimes it repels. Consistent with social dominance theory (J. Sidanius & F. Pratto, 1999), they demonstrated in 3 studies that when prospective employees supported group-based social hierarchies (i.e., were high in social dominance orientation), those in high-status groups were attracted to demographic similarity within an organization, whereas those in low-status groups were repelled by it. An important theoretical implication of the findings is that social dominance theory and traditional similarity-attraction notions together help explain a more complex relationship between demographic similarity and attraction than was previously acknowledged in the organizational literature.