Emotion response coherence: A dual-process perspective
Emotion response coherence: A dual-process perspective
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.003
复制
发表时间：
2014-04-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Mauss, Iris B.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Evers, Catharine;Hopp, Henrik;Mauss, Iris B.
人们普遍认为情绪涉及多种反应（如经验、行为和生理）之间的协调反应。然而，这种普遍的“反应一致性”假设的经验支持是不一致的。本研究采用双过程视角，认为反应一致性可能取决于反应系统（即自动反应与反射反应）。特别是，我们测试了响应一致性在每个系统内应该是最大的，在两个系统之间应该是最小的假设。为了验证这一预测，36名参与者接受了愤怒挑衅，同时测量了两种相对自动（愤怒可及性和生理）和两种相对反思（愤怒体验和工具性行为）的反应。正如预测的那样，在自动系统和反射系统内部发现了一致性，但在它们之间却没有。讨论了情绪反应一致性、双过程框架和情绪功能的意义。(C) 2013 Elsevier B.V.版权所有
Emotions are widely thought to involve coordinated responses across multiple responses (e.g., experiential, behavioral, and physiological). However, empirical support for this general "response coherence" postulate is inconsistent. The present research takes a dual-process perspective, suggesting that response coherence might be conditional upon response system (i.e., automatic versus reflective). In particular, we tested the hypothesis that response coherence should be maximal within each system and minimal across the two systems. To test this prediction, 36 participants underwent an anger provocation while two relatively automatic (anger accessibility and physiology) and two relatively reflective (anger experience and instrumental behavior) responses were measured. As predicted, coherence was found within the automatic and reflective systems, but not across them. Implications for emotion response coherence, dual-process frameworks, and the functions of emotions are discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.