Optimal dose and schedule of an HER-2/neu (E75) peptide vaccine to prevent breast cancer recurrence - From US Military Cancer Institute clinical trials group study I-01 and I-02
Optimal dose and schedule of an HER-2/neu (E75) peptide vaccine to prevent breast cancer recurrence - From US Military Cancer Institute clinical trials group study I-01 and I-02
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/cncr.23772
复制
发表时间:
2008-10-01
期刊:
影响因子:
6.2
通讯作者:
Peoples, George E.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Holmes, Jarrod P.;Gates, Jeremy D.;Peoples, George E.
BACKGROUND. E75, a HER-2/neu-derived peptide, was administered as a preventive vaccine with graulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in disease-free lymph node-positive (NP) and lymph node-negative (NN) breast cancer (BCa) patients. The optimal biologic dose (OBD) was determined based on toxicity and immunologic response.METHODS. Patients were vaccinated over 6 months (3, 4, or 6 times) with different doses of E75 plus GM-CSF. Toxicities were graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria. GM-CSF vas reduced for significant toxicity Immunologic response was measured by delayed type hypersensitivity test (DTH), and E75-specific CD8(+) T-cells were quantified with human leukocyte antigen-A2:immunoglobulin G diner and flow cytometry.RESULTS. Ninety-nine patients (48 NP and 51 NN) were vaccinated in 7 dose groups. The OBD was 1000 mu g E75 plus 250 mu g GM-CSF monthly x 6. The optimal dose group (ODG, n = 29) experienced similar toxicities to the suboptimal dose group (SDG, n = 70), which was comprised of the remaining 6 groups. The ODG demonstrated a trend toward an increase in the average postvaccine dimer (0.87 +/- 0.10% vs 0.67 +/- 0.05%; P =.07), a significantly larger DTH response (21.5 +/- 2.5 mm vs 11.3 +/- 1.3 mm; P =.0002), and a trend toward decreased recurrences (3.4% vs 12.9%; P =.27). Compared with the SDG, the ODG had larger tumors (percentage >= T2: 55% vs 23%; P =.004), more positive nodes (percentage NP: 76% vs 37%; P =.001), and higher grade tumors (percentage grade 3: 52% vs 30%; P =.07), but a shorter median follow-up time (20 months vs 32 months; P