The use of spatially patterned methods for vegetation restoration and management across systems
The use of spatially patterned methods for vegetation restoration and management across systems
复制标题
使用空间模式方法进行跨系统植被恢复和管理
作者：
Julea A. Shaw;L. Roche;E. Gornish
自然土地普遍退化，迫切需要恢复。然而，传统技术的高成本限制了修复工作的范围和成功。因此，从业人员开发了新的成本效益技术。空间模式化的恢复方法，其中建立集群的植物物种作为繁殖体来源在一个广泛的目标区域，已被提出作为实用的恢复技术。空间格局预计将降低初始成本，并提供生态效益，如增加栖息地的异质性。在过去的三十年里，多种空间模式的恢复方法已经出现在地球仪周围，但是，目前还不清楚是否应用和理论基础已连接到方法。我们进行了文献综述和文献计量网络分析，以（1）检查空间模式化恢复方法的重点研究系统，成本效益和生态结果的模式，（2）分析与常见空间模式化恢复方法相关的文献机构之间的连通性，以确定知识差距和协同作用。我们发现三种最常被研究的方法是应用成核、狭缝引晶和带状引晶。应用成核研究主要发生在热带森林，强调植物多样性和种子传播动物的访问。槽播和条播研究都主要发生在温带草原，并强调植物的建立和生产。应用的成核和狭缝播种方法有不同的理论基础，如参考文献中的模式所证明的，而条带播种方法没有从统一的文献中得出。我们讨论了需要充分的经济分析和不同方法之间的理论联系。
Widespread degradation of natural lands has created an urgent need for restoration. However, the high cost of conventional techniques limits the extent and success of restoration efforts. As a result, practitioners have developed new cost‐effective techniques. Spatially patterned restoration methods, where established clusters of plant species serve as propagule sources across a broad target area, have been proposed as practical restoration techniques. The spatial patterning is expected to reduce initial costs and provide ecological benefits such as increasing habitat heterogeneity. Over the past three decades, multiple spatially patterned restoration methods have emerged around the globe; however, it is unclear whether applications and theoretical foundations have been connected across methods. We conducted a literature review and bibliometric network analyses to (1) examine patterns in focal study systems, cost‐effectiveness, and ecological outcomes for spatially patterned restoration methods and (2) analyze connectivity among the bodies of literature associated with common spatially patterned restoration methods to identify knowledge gaps and synergies. We found the three most commonly studied methods are applied nucleation, slot seeding, and strip seeding. Applied nucleation studies mainly occurred in tropical forests and emphasized plant diversity and seed‐dispersing animal visitation. Slot‐seeding and strip‐seeding studies both primarily occurred in temperate grasslands and emphasized plant establishment and production. Applied nucleation and slot‐seeding approaches had distinct theoretical bases, as evidenced by patterns in reference citation, while strip‐seeding approaches did not draw from a unified body of literature. We discuss the need for full economic analyses and theoretical links between the different methods.
新热带雨林恢复：比较被动、种植和成核方法
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Bechara, Fernando C.;Dickens, Sara Jo;Farrer, Emily C.;Larios, Loralee;Spotswood, Erica N.;Mariotte, Pierre;Suding, Katharine N.
通讯作者：
Suding, Katharine N.