The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and related material: standardization and validation in Danish population based and clinically based samples
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and related material: standardization and validation in Danish population based and clinically based samples
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1600-0447.1999.tb10703.x
复制
发表时间：
1999-01-01
影响因子：
6.7
通讯作者：
Bilenberg, N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bilenberg, N
由佛蒙特州的Achenbach和Edelbrock开发的儿童行为检查表（CBCL）和相关材料在一项邮寄调查中得到了验证。779名4至17岁儿童的人口为基础的样本进行了比较，146名儿童转介儿童精神病服务的样本。丹麦儿童的得分与我们的斯堪的纳维亚和德国邻居非常相似，但与大多数其他国家相比较低。CBCL平均“总行为问题评分”为17.7。检查表，特别是专利和教师版本，提供了良好的结构效度。青少年普遍报告更多的情绪问题行为比他们的父母和老师对他们做的。一般来说，父母和青少年同意更多，报告情绪问题，父母和老师同意更多，分散外化行为。短筛选结构，并通过使用潜在性状分析，四个临床相关的分量表产生。预测值，敏感性，特异性和临床有效性必须在未来的两阶段研究。
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and related material, developed by Achenbach and Edelbrock in Vermont, was validated in a mailed survey. A population based sample of 779 children between the age of four and 17 years was compared to a sample of 146 children referred for child psychiatric service. Danish children scored very much like our Scandinavian and German neighbours, but low compared to most others. The CBCL mean 'total behavior problem score' in the population was 17.7. The checklists, especially the patent and teacher versions, provided good construct validity. Youths generally reported more emotional problem behavior than their parents and teachers did about them. In general, parents and youths agree more, reporting emotional problems, and parents and teachers agree more, when scattering externalizing behavior. Short screening constructs are introduced, and by the use of latent trait analysis, four clinically relevant sub-scales were generated. Predictive value, sensitivity, specificity and clinical validity must be undertaken in a future two-phase study.