State-Level Recreational Cannabis Legalization Is Not Differentially Associated with Cannabis Risk Perception Among Children: A Multilevel Regression Analysis.
State-Level Recreational Cannabis Legalization Is Not Differentially Associated with Cannabis Risk Perception Among Children: A Multilevel Regression Analysis.
复制标题
州级休闲大麻合法化与儿童大麻风险感知没有差异相关：多级回归分析。
DOI：
10.1089/can.2022.0162
复制
发表时间：
2024
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Evins,AEden
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gilman,JodiM;Iyer,MallikaT;Pottinger,EmmaG;Klugman,EmmaM;Hughes,Dylan;Potter,Kevin;Tervo-Clemmens,Brenden;Roffman,JoshuaL;Evins,AEden
随着越来越多的州通过针对成年人的娱乐性大麻法律（RCL），人们担心越来越多的（和国家批准的）大麻接受将导致儿童对大麻危害风险的认识降低。我们的目的是发现是否有RCL的国家的儿童有减少大麻的风险感知相比，国家与非法cannabs.Methods的儿童：我们分析了多地点多州青少年大脑和认知发展研究的数据，以确定如何感知大麻的危害儿童（基线年龄：9-10;N=10,395）随着时间的推移，在有和没有RCL的国家。使用多层次模型，我们评估了3年来儿童的纵向调查响应，调整了州，家庭和参与者级别的聚类和儿童级别的因素，包括人口统计学（性别，种族和社会经济地位），宗教信仰和特质Impulsivity.Results：即使在控制了人口统计学因素和其他风险（例如，冲动性）和保护性（例如，结论：这项分析表明，国家级RCL与儿童大麻风险的差异感知无关，即使在控制人口统计学，特质冲动和宗教信仰之后。未来的研究可以评估随着儿童和青少年在有和没有RCL的州继续成熟，大麻风险的感知如何变化。
Introduction:As more states pass recreational cannabis laws (RCLs) for adults, there is concern that increasing (and state-sanctioned) cannabis acceptance will result in a reduced perception of risk of harm from cannabis among children. We aimed to discover whether children in states with RCLs had decreased perception of risk from cannabis compared with children in states with illicit cannabis.Methods:We analyzed data from the multisite multistate Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study to determine how the perception of cannabis harm among children (age at baseline: 9–10;N=10,395) changes over time in states with and without RCLs. Using multilevel modeling, we assessed survey responses from children longitudinally across 3 years, adjusting for state-, family-, and participant-level clustering and child-level factors, including demographics (sex, race, and socioeconomic status), religiosity, and trait impulsivity.Results:There was no significant main effect of state RCLs on perceived risk of cannabis use, and no differences in change over time by state RCLs, even after controlling for demographic factors and other risk (e.g., impulsivity) and protective (e.g., religiosity) factors.Conclusions:This analysis indicates that state-level RCLs are not associated with differential perception of cannabis risk among children, even after controlling for demographics, trait impulsivity, and religiosity. Future studies could assess how perception of risk from cannabis changes as children and adolescents continue to mature in states with and without RCLs.