Life — A Problem Inherent in the Research Context
Life — A Problem Inherent in the Research Context
复制标题
生命——研究中固有的问题
DOI:
10.1142/9789812706560_0002
复制
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
影响因子:
64.8
通讯作者:
F. Gottwald
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
F. Gottwald
“Above all other things, the main point must be remembered: that everything that is or appears, lasts or passes, may not be thought of as totally isolated, not totally callow; as one thing is always permeated by another, accompanied, sheathed, enveloped; it influences and is influenced, and with so many beings working simultaneously, from whence should insight emanate, the decision between ruler and ruled, and between the one destined to lead and the other obliged to follow?”(Johann Wolfgang v. Goethe, 1825)All cultures in their histories of the human quest for knowledge prove that one question forms the beginning of all science and philosophy:“What is Life?” The centuries-old cultural history struggle for insights which lead to a deeper understanding of the possible meaning of life and how man ought to deal with all living things, has confirmed that there is no universal answer to what life really is. Hardly a concept, a notion or word is more ambiguous than “life”. Thus definitions serve only as sectored limitations, such as philosophical, biological or physiochemical distinctions, which inherently produce a loss of meaning. At the moment, the theories of cognitive science of living systems (as expressed in the Santiago Theory of Cognition worked out by Maturana and Varela) culminate in the proposition that the cognitive process is tantamount to the process of life. The history of philosophical