Drink less or drink slower: the effects of instruction on alcohol consumption and drinking control strategy use.
Drink less or drink slower: the effects of instruction on alcohol consumption and drinking control strategy use.
复制标题
少喝或慢喝：指导对饮酒和饮酒控制策略使用的影响。
DOI：
10.1037/a0016580
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Carey,KateB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sugarman,DawnE;Carey,KateB
简短的酒精干预通常涉及使用饮酒控制策略的建议。然而，人们对这些策略对酒精使用的功能影响知之甚少。这项前瞻性研究采用了一项实验设计来评估策略使用和饮酒之间的关系。增加策略使用或减少饮酒的指令的不同效果与仅自我监控(SM)进行了比较。将大学生饮酒者随机分为3种情况：SM加策略增加(SI；n=61)、SM加酒精减少(AR；n=60)和SM对照组(SM；n=56)。AR组的参与者在两周内减少了饮酒，而SI组的参与者并没有减少饮酒。随着时间的推移，SI组的参与者增加了策略的使用，而AR组的参与者增加了一些策略的使用，但不增加其他策略的使用。这些结果表明，增加饮酒控制策略的使用并不一定会导致饮酒量的减少。此外，所有策略与酒精消费的关联性并不相同；如果目标是减少酒精摄入量，推荐的策略类型可能很重要。(心理信息数据库记录(C)2023 APA，保留所有权利)
Brief alcohol interventions often involve recommendations to use drinking control strategies. However, little is known about the functional effect of these strategies on alcohol use. This prospective study employed an experimental design to evaluate the relationship between strategy use and alcohol consumption. The differential effects of instructions to increase the use of strategies or to reduce alcohol consumption were compared to self-monitoring (SM) only. Undergraduate drinkers were randomized into 3 conditions: SM plus strategy increase (SI; n= 61), SM plus alcohol reduction (AR; n= 60), and SM control (SM; n= 56). Participants in the AR group reduced their alcohol use over 2 weeks, while those in the SI group did not drink less. Participants in the SI group increased strategy use over time, whereas the AR group increased use of some strategies but not others. These results indicate that increasing use of drinking control strategies does not necessarily result in reduced drinking. Furthermore, all strategies are not equal in their association with alcohol consumption; if the goal is alcohol reduction, type of strategy recommended may be important.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)