Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem
Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1271
复制
发表时间：
2002-05-25
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Bacchetti, P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bacchetti, P
同行评议长期以来一直因未能发现研究中的缺陷而受到批评。彼得·巴凯蒂（Peter Bacchetti）在这里认为，它也犯了相反的错误：发现不存在的缺陷。长期以来，出版前的同行评审程序一直受到批评，因为它未能阻止错误、不清楚或次优的统计数据的出版。[12]然而，我在这里关心的不是找不到缺陷，而是找到并不存在的缺陷的补充问题。
Peer review has long been criticised for failing to identify flaws in research. Here Peter Bacchetti argues that it is also guilty of the opposite: finding flaws that are not thereThe process of peer review before publication has long been criticised for failing to prevent the publication of statistics that are wrong, unclear, or suboptimal. 1 2 My concern here, however, is not with failing to find flaws, but with the complementary problem of finding flaws that are not really there.