Open-ended participatory design as prototypical practice

Open-ended participatory design as prototypical practice
复制标题

开放式参与式设计作为典型实践

DOI:
10.1080/15710880802095400
复制
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
Erling Björgvinsson
Erling Björgvinsson
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Erling Björgvinsson

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文主张将协同设计视为一种开放式探索,其中探索原型实践,为持续的意义协商创造有利条件。回顾了针对特定实践进行设计的参与式设计方法,特别关注如何处理不断变化的实践,其中一些设计研究人员主张创建开放且灵活的技术系统,而另一些设计研究人员则强调设计主要关注不断变化的实践问题。通过讨论一个扩展的参与式设计项目,在该项目中,在重症监护病房中探索了通过自制视频参与非正式学习的新方法,我首先主张将协同设计视为原型实践,通过对可能性的开放式探索来探索。其次,我认为,对实践的关注必然需要实地探索,看看所提出的设计探索是否在工作中引用了相关的原型实践。第三,我认为,对实践的关注需要将工具视为各种环境的临时道具,而不是定义学习、认识和工作环境的核心特征。
This article argues in favour of seeing co-design as an open-ended exploration where prototypical practices are explored that engender favourable conditions for ongoing negotiation of meaning. Participatory design approaches to designing for specific practices are reviewed with particular focus on how to handle constantly evolving practices, where some design researchers argue for creating open and flexible technical systems while others emphasise design as primarily concerned with questions of changing practices. By discussing an extended participatory design project in which new ways of engaging in informal learning through self-produced videos were explored in an intensive care unit, I argue first and foremost for viewing co-design as prototypical practice which is explored through an open-ended exploration of possibilities. Second, I argue that a focus on practice necessarily requires in situ explorations to see if the proposed design explorations invoke relevant prototypical practices in the midst of work. Third, I argue that a focus on practice entails viewing tools as temporary props for various settings, rather than as central features that define the settings of learning, knowing and working.