Speech Acts of Argumentation: Inference Anchors and Peripheral Cues in Dialogue
Speech Acts of Argumentation: Inference Anchors and Peripheral Cues in Dialogue
复制标题
论证的言语行为：对话中的推理锚点和外围线索
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Reed
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Katarzyna Budzynska;C. Reed
众所周知，论证可以被有效地分析为一种独特的，如果复杂的，类型的言语行为。言语行为构成了论辩语篇的一部分，尤其是论辩对话的一部分，可以被看作是在语篇域中命题之间建立推理的锚点。大多数情况下，直接引起推理的言语行为是隐含的，但可以通过考虑所玩的对话游戏的类型在分析中得出。人工智能的方法来论证往往只集中在这样的推理作为手段，说服可以实现-但这是在心理和修辞模型，长期以来一直承认的作用所发挥的对话背景下的超逻辑功能。这些“外围”线索不仅可以影响说服效果的逻辑，“中心”的论证，但可以推翻和dominate it. This本文提出了一个理论，它允许中心和外围方面的论证，以表示在一个连贯的分析帐户的基础上的序列的言语行为，构成对话。
It is well known that argumentation can usefully be analysed as a distinct, if complex, type of speech act. Speech acts that form a part of argumentative discourse, and in particular, of argumentative dialogue, can be seen as anchors for the establishment of inferences between propositions in the domain of discourse. Most often, the speech acts that directly give rise to inference are implicit, but can be drawn out in analysis by consideration of the type of dialogue game being played. AI approaches to argumentation often focus solely on such inferences as the means by which persuasion can be effected -- but this is in contrast with psychological and rhetorical models which have long recognised the role played by extra-logical features of the dialogical context. These 'peripheral' cues can not only affect persuasive effect of the logical, 'central' argumentation, but can override and dominate it. This paper presents a theory which allows both central and peripheral aspects of argumentation to be represented in a coherent analytical account based on the sequences of speech acts which constitute dialogues.