Cell-free DNA captures tumor heterogeneity and driver alterations in rapid autopsies with pre-treated metastatic cancer.
Cell-free DNA captures tumor heterogeneity and driver alterations in rapid autopsies with pre-treated metastatic cancer.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/s41467-021-23394-4
复制
发表时间:
2021-05-27
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Juric D
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pereira B;Chen CT;Goyal L;Walmsley C;Pinto CJ;Baiev I;Allen R;Henderson L;Saha S;Reyes S;Taylor MS;Fitzgerald DM;Broudo MW;Sahu A;Gao X;Winckler W;Brannon AR;Engelman JA;Leary R;Stone JR;Campbell CD;Juric D
In patients with metastatic cancer, spatial heterogeneity of somatic alterations may lead to incomplete assessment of a cancer’s mutational profile when analyzing a single tumor biopsy. In this study, we perform sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and distinct metastatic tissue samples from ten rapid autopsy cases with pre-treated metastatic cancer. We show that levels of heterogeneity in genetic biomarkers vary between patients but that gene expression signatures representative of the tumor microenvironment are more consistent. Across nine patients with plasma samples available, we are able to detect 62/62 truncal and 47/121 non-truncal point mutations in cfDNA. We observe that mutation clonality in cfDNA is correlated with the number of metastatic lesions in which the mutation is detected and use this result to derive a clonality threshold to classify truncal and non-truncal driver alterations with reasonable specificity. In contrast, mutation truncality is more often incorrectly assigned when studying single tissue samples. Our results demonstrate the utility of a single cfDNA sample relative to that of single tissue samples when treating patients with metastatic cancer. It is currently unclear if cell-free DNA samples from metastatic cancers are as informative as tissue ones for cancer profiling. Here the authors show that cell-free DNA samples from rapid autopsies capture clonal and subclonal alterations of metastatic tumours and reveal more driver alterations than single tissue samples.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
12.3
作者:
Blokzijl F;Janssen R;van Boxtel R;Cuppen E
通讯作者:
Cuppen E
影响因子:
16.6
作者:
Chabon JJ;Simmons AD;Lovejoy AF;Esfahani MS;Newman AM;Haringsma HJ;Kurtz DM;Stehr H;Scherer F;Karlovich CA;Harding TC;Durkin KA;Otterson GA;Purcell WT;Camidge DR;Goldman JW;Sequist LV;Piotrowska Z;Wakelee HA;Neal JW;Alizadeh AA;Diehn M
通讯作者:
Diehn M
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Jiménez-Sánchez A;Memon D;Pourpe S;Veeraraghavan H;Li Y;Vargas HA;Gill MB;Park KJ;Zivanovic O;Konner J;Ricca J;Zamarin D;Walther T;Aghajanian C;Wolchok JD;Sala E;Merghoub T;Snyder A;Miller ML
通讯作者:
Miller ML
DOI:
10.1038/nrc1299
发表时间:
2004-03
期刊:
Nature reviews. Cancer
影响因子:
--
作者:
通讯作者:
--
影响因子:
30.8
作者:
通讯作者:
--