Bi plus Visibility: Characteristics of Those Who Attempt to Make Their Bisexual plus Identity Visible and the Strategies They Use

Bi plus Visibility: Characteristics of Those Who Attempt to Make Their Bisexual plus Identity Visible and the Strategies They Use
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s10508-018-1284-6
复制
发表时间:
2019-01-01
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Feinstein, Brian A.
Feinstein, Brian A.
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Davila, Joanne;Jabbour, Jeremy;Feinstein, Brian A.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

有许多形式的污名化,导致双性恋和其他非单性恋身份(统称为双性恋+或双性恋+身份)的合法化和消除。为了减少这种耻辱感,需要努力提高双+的知名度。然而,关于双性恋+个体是否试图获得更大的双性恋+可见度(即,让他们的双性恋+身份对其他人可见),如果是的话,他们是如何做到的。使用混合方法(定量和定性)互联网调查研究的397个人报告吸引力超过一个性别的数据,我们研究了试图获得更大的双+可见度的比例,他们使用的策略,以及区分那些谁做了双+可见度尝试的因素。结果表明,58%的人进行了双向+可见性尝试,最常见的是直接的口头交流(例如,告诉其他人)和视觉显示(例如,穿着双/骄傲服装、珠宝、纹身)。不太常见的尝试包括间接形式的沟通,参与LGBT相关活动和公共行为展示。那些尝试双+可见性的人与那些没有尝试的人在与身份有关的变量上不同(例如,中心性,自我肯定,社区联系)和内化的双重性。理解的原因和不作出双+能见度尝试,以及这样做的潜在后果的影响,进行了讨论。
There are numerous forms of stigma that contribute to the de-legitimization and erasure of bisexual and other non-monosexual identities (collectively referred to as bisexual+ or bi+ identities). To reduce such stigma, efforts are needed to increase bi+ visibility. Little is known, however, about whether bisexual+ individuals attempt to attain greater bi+ visibility (i.e., make their bisexual+ identity visible to others) and, if so, how they do this. Using data from a mixed-method (quantitative and qualitative) internet survey study of 397 individuals reporting attractions to more than one gender, we examined the proportion who attempted to attain greater bi+ visibility, the strategies they used to do so, and factors that distinguished those who made bi+ visibility attempts from those who did not. Results indicated that 58% made bi+ visibility attempts, with the most common being direct verbal communication (e.g., telling others) and visual displays (e.g., wearing bi/pride clothing, jewelry, tattoos). Less common attempts included indirect forms of communication, engagement in LGBT-related activities, and public behavioral displays. Those who made bi+ visibility attempts differed from those who did not on variables related to identity (e.g., centrality, self-affirmation, community connection) and internalized binegativity. Implications for understanding the reasons for and for not making bi+ visibility attempts, as well as the potential consequences of doing so, are discussed.