Combination of Weight-Bearing Training and Anti-MSTN Polyclonal Antibody Improve Bone Quality In Rats

Combination of Weight-Bearing Training and Anti-MSTN Polyclonal Antibody Improve Bone Quality In Rats
复制标题

负重训练与抗MSTN多克隆抗体相结合改善大鼠骨质量

DOI:
10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0337
复制
发表时间:
2016-12-01
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Sun, Lijun
Sun, Lijun
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tang, Liang;Gao, Xiaohang;Sun, Lijun

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

负重运动有益于骨骼健康。肌肉生长抑素(MSTN)缺乏对骨形成有积极作用。我们想知道,负重训练和MSTN多克隆抗体(MsAb)的结合是否会比单一治疗更大程度地促进骨形成。本研究将大鼠随机分为4组:对照组、负重训练组、负重训练组和负重训练组+负重训练组。训练后的大鼠以体重的35%以15m/min的速度跑步,40min/d(跑步2min后休息2min),每周6d,共8周。MsAb组大鼠每周注射1次MsAb,连续8周。MicroCT分析显示,与MsAb组相比,WT+MsAb组的骨密度(BMD)、骨体积/总体积(Bv/Tv)(p<.01)、骨小梁厚度(p<.05)、骨小梁间距(Tb.Sp)均显著增加(p<.01)。与WT组比较,WT+MsAb组骨小梁BMD(p<.05)、Bv/Tv(p<.05)显著升高,Tb.Sp(p<.05)显著降低。三点弯曲试验表明,MsAb不能改善骨的生物力学性能(p>.05),负重训练显著增加能量吸收(p<.05)和弹性模量(p<.05)。然而,当它们结合在一起时,包括最大载荷(p<.05)、硬度(p<.05)、弹性模数(p<.01)和能量吸收(p<.01)在内的生物力学性能都显著提高。结论:负重训练联合MsAb对骨骼的积极作用大于单独应用MsAb或单独进行负重训练,提示阻力训练联合MSTN拮抗剂可能是改善骨骼健康、降低骨质疏松风险的有效途径。
Weight-bearing exercise is beneficial to bone health. Myostatin (MSTN) deficiency has a positive effect on bone formation. We wondered if a combination of weight-bearing training and polyclonal antibody for MSTN (MsAb) would augment bone formation to a greater degree than single treatment. In this study, rats were randomly assigned to four groups: Control, weight-bearing training (WT), MsAb, and WT+MsAb. The trained rats ran at 15 m/min bearing with 35% of their body weight, 40 min/day (2 min of running followed by 2 min of rest), 6 days/week, for 8 weeks. The rats with MsAb were injected once a week with MsAb for 8 weeks. MicroCT analysis showed that compared with the MsAb group, WT+MsAb significantly enhanced cortical bone mineral density (BMD) (p < .01), bone volume over total volume (BV/TV) (p < .01), trabecular thickness (p < .05), and reduced trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) (p < .01). Compared with the WT group, WT+MsAb significantly increased trabecular BMD (p < .05), BV/TV (p < .05), and decreased Tb.Sp (p < .05). Three-point bending test demonstrated that MsAb failed to improve bone biomechanical properties (p > .05), weight-bearing training significantly increased energy absorption (p < .05) and elastic modulus (p < .05). However, when they combined, biomechanical properties including maximum load (p < .05), stiffness (p < .05), elastic modulus (p < .01) and energy absorption (p < .01) were all significantly enhanced. In conclusion, the combination of weight-bearing training and MsAb have a greater positive effect on bone than treatment with either MsAb or weight-bearing training alone, suggesting that resistance training in combination with MSTN antagonists could be an effective approach for improving bone health and reducing osteoporosis risk.