Measuring turbulent large-eddy structures with an ADCP. Part 2. Horizontal velocity variance
Measuring turbulent large-eddy structures with an ADCP. Part 2. Horizontal velocity variance
复制标题
使用 ADCP 测量湍流大涡流结构。
DOI:
10.1357/002224009791218823
复制
发表时间:
2009
影响因子:
0.5
通讯作者:
C. Grosch
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Gargett;A. Tejada;C. Grosch
This paper considers the degree of accuracy with which observations from an acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) can determine turbulent horizontal velocity variance. As in a previous paper addressing turbulent vertical velocity variance, we use a combination of techniques, deriving response functions from simple theory and from oceanic observations taken with a VADCP (an ADCP with an additional vertical (V) beam) in two different oceanic turbulent flows, Langmuir supercells (LSC) and unstable convection. In the case of LSC, we also determine response by sampling available Large-Eddy Simulations (LES) with specified beam geometry. In contrast with the previous investigation, where a direct measurement of vertical velocity variance was available from the vertical beam of the VADCP, we lack direct measurements of horizontal velocity variances. Thus the observational response reported here for horizontal variance is an estimate, taken as the ratio of first-order to the (assumed more accurate) second-order variance estimates made possible for the first time by the presence of a vertical beam. The theoretical response function is used to illustrate effects on response of horizontal scale, vertical/horizontal anisotropy and possible quasi-coherent phase structure of the large eddies of the turbulent field, and to predict the impact of changing (cid:1) , the angle of slant beams from vertical. Observational estimates show that convective turbulence is characterized by near-unity response throughout the water column for both horizontal velocity variances, in agreement with theoretical prediction. For Langmuir supercells, theoretical responses correctly predict qualitative behavior of the LES-derived response functions, specifically overestimation in the lower part of the water column shifting to underestimation toward the surface. LES-derived responses for different values of (cid:1) are also in agreement with theory: both approaches suggest that (cid:1) (cid:2) 30° provides more accurate measurement of horizontal turbulent velocity variance than does (cid:1) (cid:2) 20°, the present commercial standard. For all examined