THREE PETITIONS OF THE FĀṬIMID PERIOD
THREE PETITIONS OF THE FĀṬIMID PERIOD
复制标题
法伊玛王朝时期的三份请愿书
DOI：
10.1163/19606028_027_02-12
复制
发表时间：
1962
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. M. Stern
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. M. Stern
不太局限于剑桥大学图书馆、博德利图书馆和大英博物馆的收藏，而我已经对剑桥的51个”阿拉伯盒子”进行了系统的搜索，并相信我知道那里发现的所有Fdtimid文件，所有熟悉Geniza文件的人（在很大程度上由成千上万的内容最多样化的散页组成，只是表面上分类）如果我说，我远没有假设我已经追踪了甚至在我所知道的图书馆中可能存在的所有文件，更不用说那些我不熟悉的文件了，我会觉得这是很自然的。此外，还有待观察的是，其他来源的收藏品，如保存在维也纳和其他地方的文件，是否也包含类似的文件。在这方面，我不谈西奈圣凯瑟琳修道院的重要文件，或保存在科普特博物馆和开罗卡拉伊特社区档案馆的类似文件，因为这些法令由Fdtimid大法官办公室发布，并由许多世纪前授予它们的机构保存，形成一个几乎不会增加（至少相当大）的进一步发现的群体。(This我将在即将出版的题为《联邦法令》的一卷中发表和讨论许多文件，其中第一卷有九份。）这与从”考古学”来源，如Geniza和可能的发掘中获得的收藏品是完全不同的，如果学者们在这些收藏品中发现了下面几页中发表的这类文件，作者将不胜感激，他们自己出版这些文件，或者将他们的发现告诉他。我们现在可以继续讨论媒体研究，首先考虑文件本身。我们的研究的第二部分将致力于，如前所述，对Fdtimid时期请愿书的形式及其在帝国管理中的作用进行一般性调查。
less limited to the collections of the Cambridge University Library, the Bodleian Library and the British Museum, and whereas I have made a systematic search through the fifty-one" Arabic Boxes" in Cambridge and believe that I know all the Fdtimid documents found there, all those familiar with the Geniza papers (consisting to a large extent of thousands and thousands of loose sheets of the most varied content and only superficially classified) will find it natural if I say that I am far from assuming that I have traced all the documents which may exist even in the libraries known to me, not to speak of those with which I am not personally acquainted. In addition it remains to be seen whether collections of other provenance, such as papers preserved in Vienna and elsewhere, do not also contain similar documents. I do not speak in this connection of the important documents of the monastery of St. Catherine's in Sinai, or the similar documents preserved in the Coptic Museum and the archive of the Karaite community in Cairo, since these decrees issued by the Fdtimid Chancery and preserved by the bodies to which they have been granted so many centuries ago, form a group which will hardly increase (at least considerably) by further discoveries.(This lot of documents, nine in number 1, will be published and discussed by me in a forthcoming volume entitled Fditimid Decrees.) It is quite different with collections derived from" archeological" sources, such as the Geniza and, possibly, excavations, and the writer would be grateful if scholars who have found in such collections documents of the type published in the following pages, would either publish them themselves or com-municate their discoveries to him.We can now proceed in medias res and consider, first, the documents themselves. The second part of our study will be devoted, as was said before, to a general investigation into the form of the petition in the Fdtimid period and its function in the administration of that empire.