A retreat critique: Deliberations on design and ethics in the flood zone
A retreat critique: Deliberations on design and ethics in the flood zone
复制标题
撤退批评：洪水区设计和伦理的思考
DOI：
10.1080/18626033.2019.1705570
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
Larisa Ovalles
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Yarina;Miho Mazereeuw;Larisa Ovalles
摘要气候变化正日益使我们这个星球上的一些地区难以或危险地居住。“有管理的撤退”，即有意将定居点从危险区域搬迁出去，正日益成为美国和全球适应气候变化的一项拟议战略。随着设计师开始将退役纳入他们的适应战略工具包，并要求他们参与包括管理退役在内的项目，重要的是他们也要理解和谈判这种形式的气候适应对社会、政治和环境的影响。腾退项目往往充斥着股权问题：谁应该搬迁？该由谁来决定呢？波多黎各因据称的环境风险而流离失所的历史由来已久，目前由于飓风玛丽亚的破坏而提出新的撤离建议，为分析撤离项目和政策以及空间设计师在其设计和实施中的作用提供了空间。
Abstract Climate change is increasingly making areas of our planet difficult or dangerous to inhabit. ‘Managed retreat’, the intentional relocation of settlements away from hazardous zones, is growing as a proposed strategy for adapting to climate change in the United States and around the globe. As designers begin to integrate retreat into their toolkit of adaptation strategies, and as they are asked to participate in projects that include managed retreat, it is important that they also understand and negotiate the social, political and environmental implications of this form of climate adaptation. Retreat projects are often fraught with equity issues: who should relocate? And who should decide? Puerto Rico, which has a long history of displacement due to purported environmental risk, and which is currently the site of new retreat proposals as a result of Hurricane Maria’s destruction, provides a space for analysing retreat projects and policies, and the role of spatial designers in their design and implementation.