Latent tuberculosis infection treatment for prison inmates: a randomised controlled trial

Latent tuberculosis infection treatment for prison inmates: a randomised controlled trial
复制标题

DOI:
10.5588/ijtld.11.0504
复制
发表时间:
2012-05-01
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
Huang, L-M.
Huang, L-M.
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chan, P-C.;Yang, C-H.;Huang, L-M.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

环境:北方台湾的一所监狱。目的:比较4个月的每日利福平方案(4 R)与标准的6个月的每日异烟肼方案(6 H)的安全性和完成率为潜伏性结核病感染(LTBI)在监狱囚犯。设计:这是一个开放标签的随机试验,人类免疫缺陷病毒阴性的男性囚犯。没有活动性结核病(TB)且结核菌素皮试和QuantiFERON(R)-TB Gold In-Tube检测均呈阳性的囚犯符合条件,但基线谷丙转氨酶(GPT)水平≥ 120 U/l、胆红素水平≥ 2.4 U/l或血小板计数< 150 k/mm(3)的囚犯被排除在外。主要终点是任何不良事件,导致停止LTBI treatment.RESULTS:参与者(n = 373; 14%的乙型肝炎B表面抗原阳性,21%的抗丙型肝炎病毒[HCV]阳性)被随机(分层的乙型肝炎B病毒,HCV状态和2年的监禁),直接观察治疗下接受4 R或6 H。4 R组(n = 190)发生导致治疗中止的不良事件的可能性较小(2% vs. 1.2%,所有不良事件P < 0.001; 0% vs. 8%,肝毒性P < 0.001),更有可能完成LTBI治疗(86%vs.78%,P = 0.041),与6 H组(n = 183)相比。结论:4 R治疗男性服刑人员LTBI较6 H安全,完成率较高。
SETTING: A prison in northern Taiwan.OBJECTIVE: To compare safety and the completion rate of the 4-month daily rifampicin regimen (4R) vs. the standard 6-month daily isoniazid regimen (6H) for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in prison inmates.DESIGN: This was an open-label randomised trial among human immunodeficiency virus negative male inmates. Inmates without active tuberculosis (TB) who tested positive for both the tuberculin skin test and QuantiFERON (R)-TB Gold In-Tube were eligible, but those with baseline glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) levels >= 120 U/l, bilirubin levels >= 2.4 U/l or a platelet count < 150 k/mm(3) were excluded. The primary endpoint was any adverse event that resulted in discontinuation of LTBI treatment.RESULTS: Participants (n = 373; 14% hepatitis B surface antigen positive, 21% anti-hepatitis C virus [HCV] positive) were randomised (stratified by hepatitis B virus, HCV status and 2-year prison term) to receive either 4R or 6H under directly observed treatment. The 4R group (n = 190) was less likely to experience an adverse event leading to discontinuation of treatment (2% vs. 1.2%, P < 0.001 for all adverse events; 0% vs. 8%, P < 0.001 for hepatotoxicity), and more likely to complete LTBI treatment (86% vs. 78%, P = 0.041), compared with the 6H group (n = 183).CONCLUSIONS: 4R is safer and has a higher completion rate than 6H as treatment for LTBI among male prison inmates.