On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology
On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology
复制标题
论短语重音在语调音韵学中的地位
DOI：
10.1017/s0952675700003924
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
A. Arvaniti
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Grice;R. Ladd;A. Arvaniti
许多语调音韵学理论都赋予出现在韵律域边缘的音高特征一些特殊的地位，并将它们与突出的音高配置进行对比。 20世纪50年代盛行的标准美国结构主义理论（Trager & Smith 1951）对音高音素和连接音素进行了明确的区分，前者构成轮廓的主体，后者描述轮廓末端的运动。与这一发展并行的是，布拉格学派内部也对音调现象的累积功能和界定功能进行了区分（Trubetzkoy 1958），前者包括突出性，后者包括域边缘标记。博林格（尤其是 1970 年）将“重音”与“语调”区分开来：“重音”是指伴随突出重音音节的独特音高形状（现在通常称为“博林格之后的音高重音”），而“语调”则包括轮廓末端的独特音高运动等。荷兰知觉研究所 (IPO) 开发的语调理论（Cohen &’t Hart 1967，’t Hart et al. 1990）中提出了与 Bolinger 非常相似但不相同的区别，即突出借用和非突出借用音高运动之间的区别。
Many theories of intonational phonology have granted some special status to pitch features that occur at the edges of prosodic domains, contrasting them with prominence-lending pitch configurations. The standard American structuralist theory that flourished in the 1950s (Trager & Smith 1951) drew a clear distinction between PITCH PHONEMES and JUNCTURE PHONEMES, the former constituting the body of a contour and the latter describing the movements at the contour’s end. Parallel to this development, a distinction was also drawn within the Prague School between the cumulative and delimitative functions of tonal phenomena (Trubetzkoy 1958), the former including prominence, the latter domainedge marking. Bolinger (especially 1970) distinguished ‘accent’ from ‘intonation’: ACCENT referred to the distinctive pitch shapes that accompany prominent stressed syllables (now generally known, following Bolinger, as pitch accents), while INTONATION included, among other things, distinctive pitch movements at the ends of contours. A distinction very similar, but not identical, to Bolinger’s is made in the theory of intonation developed at the Institute for Perception Research (IPO) in the Netherlands (Cohen & ’t Hart 1967, ’t Hart et al. 1990), namely between PROMINENCE-LENDING and NON-PROMINENCE-LENDING pitch movements.