Coming to terms with subjectivity
Coming to terms with subjectivity
复制标题
接受主观性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jean
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. D. Smet;Jean
摘要 在本研究中，我们认为日益流行的主观性概念需要更细粒度的分析，并尝试建立不同子类别的类型学。我们首先讨论文献中出现的一些问题，例如对主观性本质的相互冲突的观点，以及为了检测主观性而定义说话者参与的方式普遍模糊。然后，在两个案例研究的基础上，我们建议区分至少三种类型的主观性，一种是与表达的使用相关的语用类型，另一种是说话者参与与表达的含义相关的语义类型。后两种类型之间的区别基于句法标准，并且在语义上涉及特定项目是否在消息内容的构建中起作用，或者在制定说话者相对于该内容的位置中起作用。
Abstract In this study, we argue that the increasingly popular concept of subjectivity is in need of a more fine-grained analysis, and we make an attempt to set up a typology of distinct sub-categories. We first discuss a number of problems that emerge from the literature, such as the conflicting views on the nature of subjectivity, and the general vagueness of the way speaker-involvement is defined in order to detect subjectivity. On the basis of two case studies, we then propose to distinguish between at least three types of subjectivity, one pragmatic type relating to the use of an expression, and two semantic types where speaker-involvement pertains to the meaning of an expression. The distinction between the latter two types is based on syntactic criteria, and semantically relates to whether a particular item functions in the build-up of the content of a message, or in the enactment of the speaker's position with respect to this content.