Rapid detection of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in epilepsy: Validation of the GAD-7 as a complementary tool to the NDDI-E in a French sample

Rapid detection of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in epilepsy: Validation of the GAD-7 as a complementary tool to the NDDI-E in a French sample
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.02.015
复制
发表时间:
2016-04-01
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
McGonigal, Aileen
McGonigal, Aileen
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Micoulaud-Franchi, Jean-Arthur;Lagarde, Stanislas;McGonigal, Aileen

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:癫痫患者中广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的诊断和治疗不足。GAD-7是用于检测GAD的筛查问卷。然而,GAD-7作为PWE筛查工具的有用性仍有待验证。因此,我们旨在:(1)验证GAD-7在法国PWE和(2)评估其互补性方面,以前验证的抑郁症筛查工具,神经障碍抑郁量表癫痫(NDDI-E)hh.Methods:这项研究是在主持下进行的ILAE委员会神经精神病学。从法国马赛的癫痫专科招募年龄>18岁的癫痫患者。以迷你国际神经精神访谈(MINI)为金标准,宾夕法尼亚州立大学焦虑问卷(PSWQ)和NDDILE为外部效度。使用卡方检验和Student’s L-Lest比较PWE伴/不伴GAD的数据。内部结构效度,外部效度,和接收操作员的特点进行了分析。对GAD-7(7项)和NDDI-E(6项)的13个项目进行方差最大旋转的主成分因子分析。结果:对145名PWE进行了测试:平均年龄= 39.38岁(SD = 1401,范围:18-75); 63.4%(92)女性; 75.9%患有局灶性癫痫。使用MINI,49例(33.8%)患者目前患有GAD。Cronbach α系数为0.898,表明内部一致性令人满意。GAD-7与PSQW评分之间的相关性很高(r(145)= .549,P-D 001),表明外部效度良好。因子分析结果表明,焦虑和抑郁两个因子在GAD-7和NDDI-E量表上的反映不同。受试者操作特征分析显示曲线下面积为0.899(95%CI 0.838-0943,P < 0.0001),表明GAD-7检测GAD(由MINI定义)的良好能力。最大灵敏度和特异性的临界值为7。在PWE中,有GAD的平均GAD-7评分为13.22(SD 3.99),而没有GAD的平均GAD-7评分为5.17(SD 4.66)。意义:本研究验证了法语版本的GAD-7筛查工具用于PWE中的广泛性焦虑,GAD的截止评分为7;21,并且还证实了GAD-7是一种简短且易于管理的Lest。因子分析显示,GAD-7(广泛性焦虑障碍筛查)和NDDI-E(重性抑郁症筛查)提供了互补的信息。GAD-7和NDDI-E的常规应用在癫痫患者的临床评估中应予以考虑。(C)2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Objective: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in people with epilepsy (PWE) is underdiagnosed and undertreated. The GAD-7 is a screening questionnaire to detect GAD. However, the usefulness of the GAD-7 as a screening tool in PWE remains to be validated. Thus, we aimed to: (1) validate the GAD-7 in French PWE and (2) assess its complementarity with regard to the previously validated screening tool for depression, the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E).Methods: This study was performed under the auspices of the ILAE Commission on Neuropsychiatry. People with epilepsy >18 years of age were recruited from the specialist epilepsy unit in Marseille, France. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was performed as gold standard, and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) and the NDDILE were performed for extemal validity. Data were compared between PWE with/without GAD using Chi2 Lest and Student's L-Lest. Internal structural validity, external validity, and receiver operator characteristics were analyzed. A principal component factor analysis with Varimax rotation was performed on the 13 items of the GAD-7 (7 items) plus the NDDI-E (6 items).Results: Testing was performed on 145 PWE: mean age = 39.38 years old (SD = 1401, range: 18-75); 63.4% (92) women; 75.9% with focal epilepsy. Using the MINI, 49 (33.8%) patients had current GAD. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.898, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. Correlation between GAD-7 and the PSQW scores was high (r (145) = .549, P- D001), indicating good external validity. Factor analysis shows that the anxiety investigated with the GAD-7 and depression investigated with the NDDI-E reflect distinct factors. Receiver operator characteristic analysis showed area under the curve of 0.899 (95% CI 0.838-0943, P < 0.0001) indicating good capacity of the GAD-7 to detect GAD (defined by MINI). Cutoff for maximal sensitivity and specificity was 7. Mean GAD-7 score in PWE with GAD was 13.22 (SD 3.99), and that without GAD was 5.17 (SD 4.66).Significance: This study validates the French language version of the GAD-7 screening tool for generalized anxiety in PWE, with a cutoff score of 7;21 for GAD, and also confirms that the GAD-7 is a short and easily administered Lest. Factor analysis shows that the GAD-7 (screening for generalized anxiety disorder) and the NDDI-E (screening for major depression) provide complementary information. The routine use of both GAD-7 and NDDI-E should be considered in clinical evaluation of patients with epilepsy. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.