Efficacy and safety of a contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) compared with a combined oral contraceptive: a 1-year randomized trial
Efficacy and safety of a contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) compared with a combined oral contraceptive: a 1-year randomized trial
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.contraception.2004.09.001
复制
发表时间：
2005-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Dieben, TOM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Oddsson, K;Leifels-Fischer, B;Dieben, TOM
This open-label, randomized, Phase III study compared the efficacy and tolerability of and compliance with NuvaRing, a combined contraceptive vaginal ring releasing 15 mu g of ethinylestradiol (EE) and 120 mu g of etonogestrel daily, with those of and with a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 150 mu g of leyonorgestrel (LNG) and 30 mu g of EE. Subjects received NuvaRing or a COC for 13 cycles (3 weeks of ring/pill treatment followed by a 1-week ring-/pill-free period). A total of 1030 subjects (NuvaRing, n = 512; COC, n = 518) was randomized and started treatment (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). The percentage of women in the ITT population who completed the trial was 70.9% for the NuvaRing group and 71.2% for the COC group. Five in-treatment pregnancies occurred in each group, giving Pearl indices of 1.23 for NuvaRing and 1.19 for the COC. Compliance with both treatments was excellent and both were well tolerated. In conclusion, NuvaRing has comparable efficacy and tolerability with a COC containing 150 mu g of LNG and 30 mu g of EE and does not require daily dosing. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
