Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity.

Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity.
复制标题

解决句法歧义的韵律线索的可靠性。

DOI:
10.1037//0278-7393.22.3.714
复制
发表时间:
1996
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ratcliff,R
Ratcliff,R
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Allbritton,DW;McKoon,G;Ratcliff,R

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

尽管先前的研究表明,听者可以使用韵律来解决口语句子中的句法歧义,但尚不清楚在实验情境下,天真的、未经训练的说话者是否通常会产生消除这些句子歧义所必需的韵律线索。在一系列的实验中,作者发现,无论是专业的还是未经训练的说话者,在简单地在消除歧义的话语环境中阅读歧义句子时,都不能始终如一地产生这种韵律线索。然而,那些意识到歧义并被告知有意地用一种或另一种意思来发音的说话者,确实产生了足够的韵律线索,让听者识别出预期的意思。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2016 APA,版权所有)
Although previous research has shown that listeners can use prosody to resolve syntactic ambiguities in spoken sentences, it is not clear whether naive, untrained speakers in experimental situations ordinarily produce the prosodic cues necessary for disambiguating such sentences. In a series of experiments, the authors found that neither professional nor untrained speakers consistently produced such prosodic cues when simply reading ambiguous sentences in a disambiguating discourse context. Speakers who were aware of the ambiguities and were told to intentionally pronounce the sentences with one meaning or the other, however, did produce sufficient prosodic cues for listeners to identify the intended meanings.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
理解单词和句子
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)x6062-5
发表时间: 1991
影响因子: 5.1
作者:
G. Simpson
通讯作者: G. Simpson
讲座:对话中言语和非言语行为的分析
DOI: 10.2307/2069575
发表时间: 1985
期刊: Contemporary Sociology
影响因子: --
作者:
G. Beattie
通讯作者: G. Beattie
Lancaster/IBM 英语口语语料库中向上箭头的研究
DOI: 10.1515/9783110865967.165
发表时间: 1991
影响因子: 2
作者:
A. Wichmann
通讯作者: A. Wichmann
思想转化为言语:语言的心理学
DOI: 10.2307/413465
发表时间: 1985
期刊: Language
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
T. Christy;J. Deese
通讯作者: J. Deese
英语自发言语中的犹豫现象
DOI: 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659682
发表时间: 1959
期刊: WORD
影响因子: 0.6
作者:
H. Maclay;C. Osgood
通讯作者: C. Osgood