2D Cartography Training: Has the Time Come for a Paradigm Shift?
2D Cartography Training: Has the Time Come for a Paradigm Shift?
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/ijgi7050197
复制
发表时间：
2018-05
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Carlos Carbonell-Carrera;Allison J. Jaeger;T. Shipley
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carlos Carbonell-Carrera;Allison J. Jaeger;T. Shipley
有等高线的二维地图对学生来说很难在三维空间中可视化来解释地形。尽管存在这一挑战，但基于二维等高线的教学仍然在使用，这可能会在学生中产生挫败感/动机问题。最近，基于增强现实（AR）等3D技术的策略已被证明对学生有激励作用。是时候在土地解释/表现的教学中进行范式转变了吗？本文展示了41名地图学专业工科学生进行二维等高线活动的实验结果。比较了AR对学生动机的影响。此外，评估了效率、有效性和用户满意度的数据。结果显示，与AR相比，传统的2D等高线活动对学生的激励作用较小。然而，学生认为做2D练习比AR更能使他们胜任，尽管他们报告说2D练习需要更多的努力。在参与者的空间推理习得方面，2D策略提供了与AR相似的结果。总体而言，这些结果表明2D教学方法仍然有效，并且可以通过使用创新的3D可视化技术加以补充。
2D maps with contour lines can be difficult for students to visualize in three-dimensions to interpret relief. Despite this challenge, teaching based on 2D contour lines is still used, which could generate frustration/motivation problems among students. Recently, strategies based on 3D technologies such as Augmented Reality (AR) have proven to be motivating for students. Has the time come for a paradigm shift in the teaching of land interpretation/representation? The present paper shows the results of an experiment in which 41 engineering students of the subject Cartography performed an activity with 2D contour lines. The impact on students’ motivation was compared with AR. In addition, data about efficiency, effectiveness and user satisfaction were assessed. Results showed that traditional 2D contour line activities were less motivating for students, compared to AR. However, students perceived that doing 2D exercises made them more competent than with AR, although they reported that the 2D exercises required more effort. In terms of participant’s spatial reasoning acquisition, 2D strategies offered results similar to AR. Overall, these results suggest that 2D teaching methodologies are still effective and can be complemented by the use of innovative 3D visualization technologies.