`A Parallel Globalization of Terror': 9-11, Security and Globalization
`A Parallel Globalization of Terror': 9-11, Security and Globalization
复制标题
“恐怖的平行全球化”：9-11，安全与全球化
DOI：
10.1177/0010836702037003676
复制
发表时间：
2002
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
M. Rasmussen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Rasmussen
关于全球化背景下的世界秩序概念如何定义安全政策的研究很少。2001年9月11日对纽约和华盛顿特区的恐怖袭击的理解方式凸显了全球化如何定义冷战后国际秩序中的威胁，以及为应对威胁而采取的政策。本文利用乌尔里希·贝克提出的全球化话语的三个要素（全球化、全球化和全球主义）来分析西方对2001年9月11日事件的反应。有人认为，这些袭击反映了一种新的“战略全球化”，全球化的新民用基础设施使第三世界集团能够干预西方。就全球化而言，“9·11”事件被视为主导1990年代后期的冷战后不安全局面的实现。恐怖袭击实现了“本体论上的不安全感”，这种不安全感源于全球化使威胁以与贸易同样的力量扩散的观念。本文以“全球主义”为重点，分析了在全球化世界中创造安全的策略，这些策略在事件发生后立即出现。作者提出了三种全球主义：特殊主义、帝国主义和世界主义。
Little research exists on how the conception of world order in terms of globalization defines security policy. The way the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, DC, on 11 September 2001 were understood highlights how globalization defines threats, and the policies adopted to deal with them, in the post-Cold War international order. This article utilizes three elements of the globalization discourse (globality, globalization and globalism) identified by Ulrich Beck in analysing the Western reaction to the events of 11 September 2001. It is argued that the attacks reflected a new `strategic globality' in which the new civilian infrastructure of globalization enabled Third World groups to intervene in the West. In terms of globalization, the events of 11 September were seen as the realization of scenarios for post-Cold War insecurity that dominated the late 1990s. The terrorist attacks actualized the `ontological insecurity' which followed from the notion that globalization enabled threats to proliferate with the same force as trade. Focusing on `globalism', the article analyses the strategies for creating safety in a globalized world that presented themselves immediately after the events. The author presents three globalisms: particularism, imperialism and cosmopolitanism.