Assessment of Low-Contrast Resolution for the American College of Radiology Computed Tomographic Accreditation Program: What Is the Impact of Iterative Reconstruction?
Assessment of Low-Contrast Resolution for the American College of Radiology Computed Tomographic Accreditation Program: What Is the Impact of Iterative Reconstruction?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/rct.0000000000000245
复制
发表时间:
2015-07-01
影响因子:
1.3
通讯作者:
McCollough, Cynthia H.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kofler, James M.;Yu, Lifeng;McCollough, Cynthia H.
ObjectiveTo compare contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) thresholds with visual assessment of low-contrast resolution (LCR) in filtered back projection (FBP) and iteratively reconstructed (IR) computed tomographic (CT) images.MethodsAmerican College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom LCR images were acquired at CTDIvol levels of 8, 12, and 16 mGy using 2 scanner models and reconstructed using one FBP and 2 IR kernels. Acquisitions were repeated 100 times. Three board-certified medical physicists blindly reviewed the LCR section images. Pass-percentage rates (PPRs) using previous and current ACR CT accreditation criteria were compared.ResultsObserver PPRs for FBP images were less than 32%. For IR images, 5 of 18 settings/dose/model configurations had PPRs greater than 32% (maximum 76.3%). For CNR evaluation of FBP images, PPRs for 15 configurations were greater than 70%. For IR images, all PPRs were at least 96%.ConclusionsThe CNR threshold used by the ACR CT accreditation program yields higher PPRs than visual assessment of LCR, potentially resulting in lower-quality images passing the ACR CNR criteria.