Legal Consciousness Reconsidered
Legal Consciousness Reconsidered
复制标题
重新思考法律意识
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
D. M. Engel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lynette J. Chua;D. M. Engel
法律意识是一个充满活力的研究领域，吸引着全世界越来越多的学者。然而，关于目标和方法的不同假设引发了激烈的争论，通常是由于未能认识到三个不同的学者群体（这里被称为身份学派、霸权学派和动员学派）正在追求不同的目标并以不同的方式运用法律意识的概念。与这三个流派相关的学术研究表明，法律意识实际上是一种具有多种应用的灵活范例，而不是单一的方法。此外，近年来新一代学者为该领域注入了活力，重点关注边缘化群体和非西方环境。通过他们的发现，以及社会科学更广泛趋势的结果，关系法律意识变得更加重要。法律意识研究应该被设想为一个连续体，从思想和行动的个人主义概念化到互动的、共同构成的方法。
Legal consciousness is a vibrant research field attracting growing numbers of scholars worldwide. Yet differing assumptions about aims and methods have generated vigorous debate, typically resulting from a failure to recognize that three different clusters of scholars—identified here as the Identity, Hegemony, and Mobilization schools—are pursuing different goals and deploying the concept of legal consciousness in different ways. Scholarship associated with these three schools demonstrates that legal consciousness is actually a flexible paradigm with multiple applications rather than a monolithic approach. Furthermore, a new generation of scholars has energized the field in recent years, focusing on marginalized peoples and non-Western settings. Through their findings, and as a result of broader trends across the social sciences, relational legal consciousness has taken on greater importance. Legal consciousness research should be imagined on a continuum ranging from individualistic conceptualizations of thought and action to interactive, co-constitutive approaches.