Vertical Ridge Augmentation of Fibula Flap in Mandibular Reconstruction: A Comparison between Vertical Distraction, Double-Barrel Flap and Iliac Crest Graft.
Vertical Ridge Augmentation of Fibula Flap in Mandibular Reconstruction: A Comparison between Vertical Distraction, Double-Barrel Flap and Iliac Crest Graft.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3390/jcm10010101
复制
发表时间:
2020-12-30
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Salmerón Escobar JI
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Navarro Cuéllar C;Ochandiano Caicoya S;Navarro Cuéllar I;Valladares Pérez S;Fariña Sirandoni R;Antúnez-Conde R;Díez Montiel A;Sánchez Pérez A;López López AM;Navarro Vila C;Salmerón Escobar JI
Double-barrel flap, vertical distraction and iliac crest graft are used to reconstruct the vertical height of the fibula. Twenty-four patients with fibula flap were reconstructed comparing these techniques (eight patients in each group) in terms of height of bone, bone resorption, implant success rate and the effects of radiotherapy. The increase in vertical bone with vertical distraction, double-barrel flap and iliac crest was 12.5 ± 0.78 mm, 18.5 ± 0.5 mm, and 17.75 ± 0.6 mm, (p < 0.001). The perimplant bone resorption was 2.31 ± 0.12 mm, 1.23 ± 0.09 mm and 1.43 ± 0.042 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. There were significant differences in vertical bone reconstruction and bone resorption between double-barrel flap and vertical distraction and between iliac crest and vertical distraction (p < 0.001). The study did not show significant differences in implant failure (p = 0.346). Radiotherapy did not affect vertical bone reconstruction (p = 0.125) or bone resorption (p = 0.237) but it showed higher implant failure in radiated patients (p = 0.015). The double-barrel flap and iliac crest graft showed better stability in the height of bone and less bone resorption and higher implant success rates compared with vertical distraction. Radiation therapy did not affect the vertical bone reconstruction but resulted in a higher implant failure.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1016/j.bjps.2012.10.005
发表时间:
2013-03-01
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Shen, Yi;Guo, Xue-hua;Ow, Andrew
通讯作者:
Ow, Andrew
DOI:
10.1016/j.bjps.2011.12.035
发表时间:
2012-07-01
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Shen, Yi;Sun, Jian;Ow, Andrew
通讯作者:
Ow, Andrew
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Virgin, Frank W.;Iseli, Tim A.;Rosenthal, Eben L.
通讯作者:
Rosenthal, Eben L.
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Nocini, PF;Wangerin, K;Cortelazzi, R
通讯作者:
Cortelazzi, R
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
HIDALGO, DA
通讯作者:
HIDALGO, DA