[The current panorama of euthanasia in Spain].
[The current panorama of euthanasia in Spain].
复制标题
[西班牙安乐死现状]。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
V. Moya Pueyo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Vega Vega;V. Moya Pueyo
由于医疗技术的不断进步，医生甚至能够延长那些患有不治之症的病人的生命。经常使用或不对这些类型的患者不同的治疗是质疑，谁要求在自己的人自主决定停止治疗。这就是为什么建议调查对遗漏或停止治疗的意见和态度，这可能会延长生命（被动安乐死）或主动安乐死在临终病人。进行了一项为病人保密的调查，有1，109人参加，他们来自三个不同的人群：医院卫生专业人员来自马德里圣卡洛斯大学医院的医生n = 346和护士n = 346;来自马德里孔普鲁腾塞大学的学生（n = 261）和来自位于马德里省（平托）的老年人俱乐部的退休人员（n = 156）。样本由40%的男性和60%的女性组成，年龄在20至90岁之间。大多数被调查者在某些情况下同意或完全同意省略或停止药物，可以延长生命的临终病人（被动安乐死）（70%）。关于主动安乐死，超过一半（55%）的人反对，34%的人在某些情况下同意，10%的人完全同意。在年龄、宗教信仰、政治思想等因素上，差异有统计学意义（p < 0.05）。将这些结果与其他已有的结果进行比较。
Due to the fact of the continuous advances of medical technology, physicians are able to prolong life even in those patients who suffer from a terminal illness to whom no hope to recover from it is left. Frequently the use or not of different therapies on these type of patients is questioned, who demand the autonomy over the self person to decide the cessation of a treatment. That is why it was proposed to investigate on the opinions and attitudes on the omission or cessation of treatments which could prolong life (passive euthanasia) or active euthanasia in terminal patients. A survey, which preserved the confidentiality of patients, was done in which 1,109 individuals took part coming from three different sectors of the population: hospital health professionals (physicians n = 346 and nurses n = 346) from San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid; students (n = 261) from Madrid Complutense University, and retired individuals (n = 156) from an elderly people club located at the Madrid province (Pinto). Sample was formed by 40% of males and 60% of females, with ages between 20 and 90 years. Most of the surveyed people agreed in certain circumstances or totally agree with omission or cessation of drugs which could prolong life (passive euthanasia) in terminal patients (70%). Regarding active euthanasia more than half (55%) opposed to it, 34% agreed in certain circumstances and 10% agreed completely. Significant differences were detected (p < 0.05) related to age, religious beliefs and political thoughts of the subjects. These results are compared to others already available.