Indirect vs direct hospital quality indicators for very low-birth-weight infants
Indirect vs direct hospital quality indicators for very low-birth-weight infants
复制标题
DOI:
10.1001/jama.291.2.202
复制
发表时间:
2004-01-14
影响因子:
120.7
通讯作者:
Geppert, J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rogowski, JA;Horbar, JD;Geppert, J
Context Evidence-based selective referral strategies are being used by an increasing number of insurers to ensure that medical care is provided by high-quality providers. In the absence of direct-quality measures based on patient outcomes, the standards currently in place for many conditions rely on indirect-quality measures such as patient volume.Objectives To assess the potential usefulness of volume as a quality indicator for very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants and compare volume with other potential indicators based on readily available hospital characteristics and patient outcomes.Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective study of 94110 VLBW infants weighing 501 to 1500 g born in 332 Vermont Oxford Network hospitals with neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2000.Main Outcome Measures Mortality among VLBW infants prior to discharge home; detailed case-mix adjustment was performed by using patient characteristics available immediately after birth.Results In hospitals with less than 50 annual admissions of VLBW infants, an additional 10 admissions were associated with an 11% reduction in mortality (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-16%; P