Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly.
Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly.
复制标题
词汇决策任务中的语音启动：规律性效应不是组装的必要证据。
DOI：
10.1037//0096-1523.23.6.1727
复制
发表时间：
1997
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Berent,I
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Berent,I
通过比较两个标记：规则性效应和语音启动，在词汇决策任务中检查了组合音系在英语阅读中的贡献。策略控制是通过操纵陪衬的语音词汇来评估的：实验 1 使用合法的非单词，而实验 2 使用伪同音词。重复现有的研究结果，在存在合法非单词的情况下获得了零规律性效应。使用伪同音箔观察到适度的规律性效应（仅在准确性方面）。相比之下，无论是否存在规律性效应，每个实验中都出现了语音启动效应。因此，组合音韵学限制了在强烈阻碍其使用的条件下的阅读。然而，规律性效应并不是其存在的必要证据。根据两周期模型讨论了规律性和语音启动效应的分离。
The contribution of assembled phonology in reading English was examined in the lexical decision task by comparing two markers: regularity effects and phonological priming. Strategic control was assessed by manipulating the phonological lexicality of the foils: Experiment 1 used legal nonwords, whereas Experiment 2 used pseudohomophones. Replicating existing findings, null regularity effects were obtained in the presence of legal nonwords. Modest regularity effects, in accuracy only, were observed with pseudohomophone foils. In contrast, phonological priming effects emerged in each of the experiments, regardless of the presence of regularity effects. Assembled phonology thus constrains reading under conditions that strongly discourage its use. However, regularity effects are not necessary evidence for its presence. The dissociation of regularity and phonological priming effects is discussed in terms of the two-cycles model.