The efficacy and safety of cangrelor in single vessel vs multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from CHAMPION PHOENIX
The efficacy and safety of cangrelor in single vessel vs multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from CHAMPION PHOENIX
复制标题
坎格雷洛在单支血管与多支经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的疗效和安全性:CHAMPION PHOENIX 的见解
DOI:
10.1002/clc.23221
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Mahaffey KW
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yong CM;Sundaram V;Abnousi F;Olivier CB;Yang J;Stone GW;Steg PG;Gibson CM;Hamm CW;Price MJ;Deliargyris E;Prats J;White HD;Harrington RA;Bhatt DL;Mahaffey KW
BackgroundThe intravenous, rapidly acting P2Y12 inhibitor cangrelor reduces the rate of ischemic events during PCI with no significant increase in severe bleeding. However, the efficacy and safety of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients treated with single vessel (SV)‐percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or multivessel (MV)‐PCI remains unexplored.MethodsWe studied the modified intention‐to‐treat population of patients from the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial who were randomized to either cangrelor or clopidogrel. We used logistic regression and propensity score matching to evaluate the effect of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel on the primary efficacy outcome (composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia‐driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis) at 48 hours. The safety outcome was moderate or severe Global Utilization of Streptokinase and tPA for Occluded Arteries bleeding at 48 hours.HypothesisCangrelor is as efficacious and safe as clopidogrel in both SV and MV PCI.ResultsAmong 10 854 patients, 9204 (85%) underwent SV‐ and 1650 (15%) MV‐PCI. After adjustment, cangrelor was associated with similar reductions vs clopidogrel in the primary efficacy outcome in patients undergoing SV‐PCI (4.5% vs 5.2%; odds ratio [OR] 0.81 [0.66‐0.98]) or MV‐PCI (6.1% vs 9.8%, OR 0.59 [0.41‐0.85]; Pint 0.14). Similar results were observed after propensity score matching (SV‐PCI: 5.5% vs 5.9%, OR 0.93 [0.74‐1.18]; MV‐PCI: 6.2% vs 8.9%, OR 0.67 [0.44‐1.01]; Pint 0.17). There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the treatment effect of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel for the safety outcome.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing SV‐ or MV‐PCI, cangrelor was associated with similar relative risk reductions in ischemic complications and no increased risk of significant bleeding compared with clopidogrel, which highlights the expanding repertoire of options for use in complex PCI.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Leonardi, Sergio;Mahaffey, Kenneth W.;Bhatt, Deepak L.
通讯作者:
Bhatt, Deepak L.
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Brener, Sorin J.;Milford-Beland, Sarah;Brindis, Ralph G.
通讯作者:
Brindis, Ralph G.
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Brener, SJ;Murphy, SA;Cannon, CP
通讯作者:
Cannon, CP
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Casey, C;Faxon, DP
通讯作者:
Faxon, DP
影响因子:
1.6
作者:
Mokadam, Nahush A.;Melford, Ryland E., Jr.;Aldea, Gabriel S.
通讯作者:
Aldea, Gabriel S.