Can a linking crosswalk table be applied to a different population? An independent validation study for a crosswalk between BSI depression and PROMIS depression scales.
Can a linking crosswalk table be applied to a different population? An independent validation study for a crosswalk between BSI depression and PROMIS depression scales.
复制标题
连接人行横道表可以应用于不同的人群吗？ BSI 抑郁症和 PROMIS 抑郁量表交叉的独立验证研究。
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0278232
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Gorbach, Pamina M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tang, Xiaodan;Schalet, Benjamin D.;Janulis, Patrick;Kipke, Michele D.;Kaat, Aaron;Mustanski, Brian;Newcomb, Michael E.;Ragsdale, Amy;Kim, Soyeon;Siminski, Sue;Gorbach, Pamina M.
A linking procedure establishes a “bridge” between the scores from different patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments that measure similar constructs. After developing a linking relationship however, it is critical to evaluate whether this relationship can be generalized to different groups. Our study aims to validate a published crosswalk for score conversion between the Brief Symptom Inventory Depression subscale and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression 8a using an independent sample. Data were from a sample of young men who have sex with men (MSM), which differs in terms of participant age, race, and ethnicity from the sample used to develop the existing crosswalk. The validity of the newly derived crosswalk was evaluated in terms of the correlation, mean difference and standard deviation between the observed and the linked scores. The two crosswalks were further compared to evaluate if the difference was within an acceptable range. More than half of the item parameters obtained from the two samples were found to overlap in their confidence intervals. Differences between each pair of scores in the two crosswalks was within three T-score points, well within the range of each crosswalk score’s standard error. This study concludes that an existing crosswalk is replicable on a sample that differs from that used for crosswalk development, but future research should continue to examine the generalizability of the linked parameters and evaluate the reproducibility of this crosswalk to other populations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3
作者：
Bjorner, Jakob Bue
通讯作者：
Bjorner, Jakob Bue
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Hill C;de Beer LT;Bianchi R
通讯作者：
Bianchi R
DOI：
10.1080/10705519909540118
发表时间：
1999-01-01
影响因子：
6
作者：
Hu, Li-tze;Bentler, Peter M.
通讯作者：
Bentler, Peter M.
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Schalet BD;Janulis P;Kipke MD;Mustanski B;Shoptaw S;Moore R;Baum M;Kim S;Siminski S;Ragsdale A;Gorbach PM
通讯作者：
Gorbach PM
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
Dorans, NJ;Holland, PW
通讯作者：
Holland, PW