Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: Evidence from ROC curves
Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: Evidence from ROC curves
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.001
复制
发表时间：
2006-11-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Dunn, John
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Heathcote, Andrew;Raymond, Frances;Dunn, John
再认记忆依赖于离散的回忆、连续的证据，还是两者兼而有之？连续性证据是否仅对研究的新近性和持续时间（熟悉程度）敏感，还是对研究事件的细节也敏感？双加工理论认为再认是建立在回忆和熟悉的基础上的，只有回忆提供了关于学习细节的知识。单过程理论假设一个单一的连续证据维度，可以提供有关熟悉度和细节的信息。我们复制列表（Yonelinas，1994年）和复数（Rotello，麦克米伦，和货车塔塞尔，2000年）的歧视实验，需要的细节知识，以区分类似的非目标的目标。我们还进行了这些实验的修改版本，旨在通过删除可以仅通过熟悉度区分的非目标来增加回忆。单过程模型提供了最好的权衡之间的拟合优度和模型的复杂性和双过程模型能够占的数据，只有当他们纳入连续的证据敏感的细节。(c)2006年爱思唯尔公司All rights reserved.
Does recognition memory rely on discrete recollection, continuous evidence, or both? Is continuous evidence sensitive to only the recency and duration of study (familiarity), or is it also sensitive to details of the study episode? Dual process theories assume recognition is based on recollection and familiarity, with only recollection providing knowledge about study details. Single process theories assume a single continuous evidence dimension that can provide information about familiarity and details. We replicated list (Yonelinas, 1994) and plural (Rotello, Macmillan, & Van Tassel, 2000) discrimination experiments requiring knowledge of details to discriminate targets from similar non-targets. We also ran modified versions of these experiments aiming to increase recollection by removing non-targets that could be discriminated by familiarity alone. Single process models provided the best trade-off between goodness-of-fit and model complexity and dual process models were able to account for the data only when they incorporated continuous evidence sensitive to details. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.