Effect of static and ballistic stretching on the muscle-tendon tissue properties

Effect of static and ballistic stretching on the muscle-tendon tissue properties
复制标题

DOI:
10.1249/01.mss.0000247004.40212.f7
复制
发表时间:
2007-03-01
期刊:
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Witvrouw, Erik
Witvrouw, Erik
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mahieu, Nele Nathalie;McNair, Peter;Witvrouw, Erik

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

MAHIEU, N. N.、P. MCNAIR、M. DE MUYNCK、V. STEVENS、I. BLANCKAERT、N. SMITS 和 E. WITVROUW。静态和弹道拉伸对肌肉肌腱组织特性的影响。医学。科学。体育锻炼,卷。 39,第 3 期,第 494-501 页,2007 年。目的:已经进行了许多研究来定义静态和弹道拉伸的效果。然而,大多数研究人员将注意力集中在关节运动范围测量上。本研究的目的是调查静态和弹道拉伸程序是否对踝关节等速被动运动期间测量的被动阻力矩以及超声成像测量的肌腱刚度有不同的影响。方法:81 名健康受试者被随机分为三组:静态拉伸组、弹道拉伸组和对照组。两个拉伸组都进行了为期 6 周的小腿肌肉拉伸计划。在此期间之前和之后,对所有受试者的踝关节运动范围、跖屈肌的被动阻力矩以及跟腱的硬度进行了评估。结果:研究结果表明,所有组的背屈运动范围均显着增加。静态拉伸导致被动阻力矩显着降低,但跟腱刚度没有变化。相比之下,弹道拉伸对跖屈肌的被动阻力矩没有显着影响。然而,在弹道拉伸组中观察到跟腱硬度显着下降。结论:这些发现提供了证据,表明静态拉伸和弹道拉伸对被动阻力矩和肌腱刚度有不同的影响,训练和康复计划应考虑这两种类型的拉伸。
MAHIEU, N. N., P. MCNAIR, M. DE MUYNCK, V. STEVENS, I. BLANCKAERT, N. SMITS, and E. WITVROUW. Effect of Static and Ballistic Stretching on the Muscle-Tendon Tissue Properties. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 494-501, 2007. Purpose: Many studies have been undertaken to define the effects of static and ballistic stretching. However, most researchers have focused their attention on joint range-of-motion measures. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether static- and ballistic-stretching programs had different effects on passive resistive torque measured during isokinetic passive motion of the ankle joint and tendon stiffness measured by ultrasound imaging. Methods: Eighty-one healthy subjects were randomized into three groups: a static-stretch group, a ballistic-stretch group, and a control group. Both stretching groups performed a 6-wk stretching program for the calf muscles. Before and after this period, all subjects were evaluated for ankle range of motion, passive resistive torque of the plantar flexors, and the stiffness of the Achilles tendon. Results: The results of the study reveal that the dorsiflexion range of motion was increased significantly in all groups. Static stretching resulted in a significant decrease of the passive resistive torque, but there was no change in Achilles tendon stiffness. In contrast, ballistic stretching had no significant effect on the passive resistive torque of the plantar flexors. However, a significant decrease in stiffness of the Achilles tendon was observed in the ballistic-stretch group. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence that static and ballistic stretching have different effects on passive resistive torque and tendon stiffness, and both types of stretching should be considered for training and rehabilitation programs.