Confusing one person with another: what errors reveal about the elementary forms of social relations.

Confusing one person with another: what errors reveal about the elementary forms of social relations.
复制标题

将一个人与另一个人混淆:哪些错误揭示了社会关系的基本形式。

DOI:
10.1037//0022-3514.60.5.656
复制
发表时间:
1991
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
Fiske,ST
Fiske,ST
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fiske,AP;Haslam,N;Fiske,ST

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

七项研究调查了当人们将一个人与另一个人混淆时,社会关系的认知结构所表现出的替代模式。这些研究调查了自然错误,即人们用错误的名字称呼熟悉的人,错误地记住他们与之互动的人,或者错误地将行动指向不合适的人。这些研究测试了AP Fiske(1990;也见PA,1997:30765)的关系模型理论,即人们使用4种基本的社会关系模型。所有7个研究都支持这一理论;学生倾向于混淆与他们互动的人在相同的基本关系模式。此外,学生会混淆同性别的人。其他因素(年龄,种族,角色术语,名字相似性)通常具有较小的,不太可靠的影响,这表明4种基本关系模式是日常社会认知中最突出的图式之一。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2016阿帕,保留所有权利)
Seven studies investigated the cognitive structure of social relationships exhibited in the patterns of substitutions that occur when people confuse a person with another. The studies investigated natural errors in which people called a familiar person by the wrong name, misremembered with whom they had interacted, or mistakenly directed an action at an inappropriate person. These studies tested the relational-models theory of AP Fiske (1990; see also PA, Vol 77: 30765) that people use 4 basic models for social relationships. All 7 studies provide support for the theory; Ss tend to confuse people with whom they interact in the same basic relationship mode. In addition, Ss confuse people of the same gender. Other factors (age, race, role term, similarity of names) generally have smaller, less reliable effects, indicating that the 4 elementary modes of relationships are among the most salient schemata in everyday social cognition.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)