Ethical Conundrums in Fatality Review Planning, Data Collection, and Reporting

Ethical Conundrums in Fatality Review Planning, Data Collection, and Reporting
复制标题

死亡人数审查计划、数据收集和报告中的道德难题

DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gabe Campos
Gabe Campos
中科院分区：
--
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Albright;Laura L Banks;Lisa Broidy;C. Crandall;Gabe Campos

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

死亡审查的多学科、跨专业实践在方法上迅速变得更加复杂。然而，与死亡审查相关的道德问题的讨论仅限于保密主题和参与者职业的道德准则。我们建议死亡审查小组的工作类似于评估的研究实践。本文采用美国评估协会（AEA）推荐的评估指导原则，开始探索家庭暴力死亡审查小组面临的潜在道德难题，并提出确保小组拥有必要的道德实践工具的建议。
The multidisciplinary, interprofessional practice of fatality review is quickly becoming more methodologically sophisticated. However, the discussion of ethical issues related to fatality review has been limited to the topics of confidentiality and the ethical guidelines of participant professions. We propose that the work of fatality review teams is similar to the research practice of evaluation. Using the Guiding Principles of Evaluation recommended by the American Evaluation Association (AEA), this paper begins an exploration of potential ethical conundrums faced by domestic violence fatality review teams and identifies suggestions for ensuring that the teams have the necessary tools for ethical practice.