Evaluating the outcomes of co-production in local government
Evaluating the outcomes of co-production in local government
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/03003930.2019.1702530
复制
发表时间：
2020-01-02
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Mortensen, Nanna Moeller
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brix, Jacob;Krogstrup, Hanne Kathrine;Mortensen, Nanna Moeller
新公共治理假设共同生产会带来有益的结果，例如提高效率和改善公民福祉。然而，很少有实证研究记录了这些结果，有些研究表明，假设的结果并没有出现。本研究表明，共同生产是一种复杂的社会现象，这意味着共同生产活动及其结果之间不可能存在明确的因果关系。资格，并使进一步的实证调查的结果，共同制作，研究建议，贡献分析应适用于作为一个适当的评价范式，从理论上降低复杂性，并确定一个通用的方案理论共同制作。该研究还讨论了如何创建和操作的本地合作生产计划理论可以发生在本地化水平上的合作生产的举措和成果之间的关系进行评估。最后，方向提供了如何共同生产的成果可以与公民共同评估。
New Public Governance assumes that co-production leads to beneficial outcomes, such as increased efficiency and better citizen well-being. However, few empirical studies have documented these outcomes, and some have demonstrated that the assumed outcomes do not emerge. This study establishes that co-production is a complex, social phenomenon, which implies that there cannot be a clear cause-effect relationship between co-production activities and their outcomes. To qualify and enable further empirical investigation of the outcomes of co-production, the study proposes that contribution analysis should be applied as an appropriate evaluation paradigm to theoretically reduce complexity and define a generic programme theory for co-production. The study also discusses how the creation and operationalisation of a local co-production programme theory can take place to evaluate the relationship between co-production initiatives and outcomes on a localised level. Finally, directions are provided for how the outcomes of co-production can be co-evaluated with citizens.