IV. Marine Algæ, Rhodophyceæ, of the ‘Sealark’ Expedition, collected by Mr. J. Stanley Gardiner, M.A.
IV. Marine Algæ, Rhodophyceæ, of the ‘Sealark’ Expedition, collected by Mr. J. Stanley Gardiner, M.A.
复制标题
IV. 海藻，红藻，来自“海豹”探险队，由 J. Stanley Gardiner 先生收集，M.A.
DOI：
10.1111/j.1095-8339.1913.tb00282.x
复制
发表时间：
1913
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Bosse
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Bosse
I.导论.第二个：以下论文中所讨论的是J.斯坦利加德纳先生在1905年珀西斯拉登信托考察印度洋时收集的。起初，A女士打算。Gepp应该工作收集，但她把它交给了我，和疾病阻止她参加工作，我们只会太高兴一起进行。然而，她在把材料寄给我之前已经把它分类了。这本书并不包含斯坦利加德纳先生收集的所有红藻;利特姆塔姆尼克是已故的福斯利先生研究出来的。关于印度洋这一部分藻类的文献很少，除了福斯利先生的论文和A. Gepp，MA，FLS和E夫人。Gepp，我只知道一篇论文提到了这个地区的几种藻类。Reinbold先生在“Meeresalgen der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition”一书中提到了产自迭戈·加西亚和马赫6的26种红藻，其中10种也被Stanley加德纳先生采集。除了莱因博尔德先生的这篇论文之外，我还发现了另外两篇关于塞舌尔的简短文献：来自迭戈·加西亚和塞舌尔。WB Hemsley先生在他的“关于迭戈·加西亚植被的报告”中添加了关于A lp的注释。在仅命名为Busycc indicu，J.Ag.的藻类中，目前对我们有任何兴趣;这是唯一提到的红色。一张“J. € 3”的便条。在“知识”治疗只有Myxophyceae，因此可能会通过在沉默。“海豹”系列对我有特殊的兴趣，因为我只是在Reinbold先生的帮助下，在马来群岛的“Siboga”探险期间收集的藻类清单的第一部分。这一部分包括了黏藻、绿藻和褐藻;第二部分包括了红藻，我希望很快就能完成。从植物地理学的角度来看，对一个如此靠近马来群岛的地区的研究给了我极大的兴趣。然而，它有一个缺点;我在“西博加”收藏中发现的并被认为是新物种的一些物种也在斯坦利加德纳收藏中发现，而且关于印度洋藻类的论文将出现在西博加论文之前，这将减少后者的新颖性。但这是无法避免的，我已经尽可能全面地描述了新物种;只有在一种情况下，当除了“Siboga”探险队的肥沃标本之外不可能识别出贫瘠的小碎片时，我才参考了forthcomisg论文。
I. Introduction. THE alga: treated of in the following paper were collected by Mr. J. Stanley Gardiner during the Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905. It was at first intended that Mrs. A. Gepp should work out the collection, but she handed it over to me, and illness prevented her joining in the work, which we would only have been too glad to carry out together. She had, however, sorted the material before sending it to me.The collection does not contain all the Rhodophycee collected by Mr. Stanley Gardiner; the Litlmthamnicc have been worked out by the late lamented Mr. Foslie. The literature on the algae of this part of the Indian Ocean is scarce, for besides the paper by Mr. Foslie and the Report on the Chlorophpcea: and Phaeophyceae of the’Sealark’Expedition by A. Gepp, MA, FLS, and Mrs. E. Gepp, I only know of one paper in which more than a few algae of this region are mentioned. Mr. Reinbold, in “Meeresalgen der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition,” mentions 26 species of Rhodophyceae from Diego Garcia and Mah6, 10 of whic: h have been also collected by Mr. Stanley Gardiner. Besides this paper of Mr. Reinbold, I have found two other short references to alga: from Diego Garcia and the Seychelles. Mr. WB Hemsley adds a note on A lp to his “Report on the Vegetation of Diego Garcia.” Of the algae named only Busycc indicu, J. Ag., has any interest for us at present; it is the only Red alga mentioned. A note by “J.€ 3.’’in ‘Knowledge’treats only of Myxophyceae, and may therefore be passed over in silence. The ‘Sealark’collection had special interest for me because I am just publishina, with the aid of Mr. Reinbold, the first part of a list of algae collected during the ‘Siboga’Expedition in the Malay Archipelago. This part contains the Myxophyceae, Chlorophyceae, and the Phzeophyceae; the second part, containing the Rhodophyceae, will, I hope, follow soon. The study of a region so near to the Malay Archipelago afforded me great interest from a phyto-geographical standpoint. It had, however, one drawback; some species found by me in the ‘Siboga’collection and recognized as new are also found in the Stanley Gardiner collection, and the faet that the paper on the algae of the Indian Ocean will appear before the Siboga paper, will diminish the number of novelties in the latter. But this could not be avoided, and I have described the new species as fully as I could; only in one case, when the barren, small fragment could not possibly have been recognized apart from the fertile specimens of the ‘Siboga’Expedition, have I referred to the forthcomisg paper.