Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research.

Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research.
复制标题

DOI:
10.7748/ns.23.23.42.s50
复制
发表时间:
2009-02-11
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Marland, Glenn R
Marland, Glenn R
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jootun, Dev;McGhee, Gerry;Marland, Glenn R

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文说明了如何反身性的概念已经成熟,结合定性研究的发展,并提出了列入一个反身帐户,以增加研究过程的严谨性的情况。定性研究(Jootun和McGhee 2006)被用来说明自反过程如何提高数据的可靠性。自反性是一个宝贵的工具,以促进对所研究的现象和研究者的作用的理解。研究人员和参与者之间的关系和影响应该明确。
This article illustrates how the concept of reflexivity has matured in conjunction with developments in qualitative research, and makes the case for inclusion of a reflexive account to increase the rigour of the research process. A qualitative study (Jootun and McGhee 2006) is used to show how the reflexive process improved data reliability. Reflexivity is an invaluable tool to promote understanding of the phenomenon under study and the researcher's role. The relationship between, and influence of, the researcher and participants should be made explicit.