Categorical Versus Dimensional Classification: Implications from and For Research
Categorical Versus Dimensional Classification: Implications from and For Research
复制标题
分类与维度分类：研究的意义和研究的意义
DOI：
10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.287
复制
发表时间：
1992
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
T. Widiger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Widiger
本文讨论了从研究和研究的维度模型的分类的影响。文献讨论方面的表面效度，效用和描述效度，实证支持DSM-III-R的分类区分，信度和并发效度，和计量分析。综述的结论是，研究人员应该使用更多的定量（维度）评估，至少除了DSM-III-R分类诊断。如果将人格障碍作为连续变量而不是离散变量进行评估，那么与人格障碍的病因、病理、预后和治疗有关的研究将更加有力和翔实。
This paper discusses the implications from research and for research of a dimensional model of classification. Literature is discussed with respect to face validity, utility and descriptive validity, the empirical support for the DSM-III-R categorical distinctions, reliability and concurrent validity, and taxometric analyses. The conclusion of the review is that researchers should use more quantitative (dimensional) assessments, at least in addition to the DSM-III-R categorical diagnoses. Research concerned with the etiology, pathology, prognosis, and treatment of the personality disorders will be more powerful and informative if personality disorders are assessed as continuous rather than as discrete variables.
DSM-III 和真理的政治。
DOI：
10.1037//0003-066x.40.5.513
发表时间：
1985
期刊：
The American psychologist
影响因子：
--
作者：
Schacht,TE
通讯作者：
Schacht,TE
精神分裂症的诊断和预后。
影响因子：
--
作者：
Cloninger,CR;Martin,RL;Guze,SB;Clayton,PJ
通讯作者：
Clayton,PJ