Separation of Citrus Tristeza Virus (CTV) Serotypes Through Aphid Transmission
Separation of Citrus Tristeza Virus (CTV) Serotypes Through Aphid Transmission
复制标题
通过蚜虫传播分离柑橘 Tristeza 病毒 (CTV) 血清型
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1991
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Koizumi
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Kano;M. Koizumi
Twenty different subcultures of citrus tristeza virus (CTV) were obtained from 15 different original field sources by transmission with the aphid Toxoptera citricidus (Kirk). The 20 aphid-transmitted subcultures (ATS), and 15 field sources were tested by double sandwich indiret ELISA using two monoclonal antibodies (MAb), MCA13 and 3DF1, and by double sandwich ELISA using polyclonal antibodies (PAb). Four ATS isolates derived from two field source (FS) isolates showed reactions different from their parent FS. For example, a mild CTV from one FS, M27, reacted strongly to MCA13, 3DF1 and PAb, while three ATS isolates from M27 reacted with PAb, but not with either MAb. These results indicate that a t least two different serotypes can infect one citrus plant, and that separation of certain serotypes can occur through aphid transmission. Index words: ELISA, monoclonal antibody. In the accompanying paper (6), the serological diversity of citrus tristeza virus (CTV) from different field sources (FS) in Japan was identified using monoclonal antibodies (MAb) which are specific to different epitopes in the CTV coat protein (3). CTV is known to exist as a complex or mixture of different isolates in the field, and separation of components from these complexes has been reported by several workers. For example, separation of mild strains has been accomplished by tissue grafting after heat treatment of infeced plants (I), by vector transmission (9), and by tissue grafting from trees which showed recovery from seedling yellows (SY) (14). In this paper, we compared the reactions of parent F S cultures and aphid-transmitted subcultures (ATS) with two MAbs, MCA13 (10) and 3DF1 (13)) and a polyclonal antibody (PAb) to determine whether their serological reactions change after aphid transmission. Data are presented indicating that separation of a specific CTV component from a mixture of components in the same plant can be achieved by aphids and detected by use of differential MAb. MATERIALS AND METHODS screenhouses. The CTV F S tested are shown in Table 1 and have been previously described (4, 5, 6, 7). Aphid vectors. Toxoptera citricidus (Kirk.) was collected from a citrus grove a t the Okitsu Branch, Fruit Tree Research Station (FTRS) and reared on synthetic diet (8) for at least 8 days to obtain a colony of nonviruliferous aphids. The diet (enclosed in laboratory film sachets on a glass cup) was changed every 2 days. The aphids were transferred to healthy trifoliate orange seedlings, which are resistant to CTV. Virus transmission. Donor plants were graft-inoculated rough lemon or Madam Vinous sweet orange seedlings or the F S cultivar grafted to rough lemon seedlings. Aphids were reared on new flushes of the acquisition host for at least 7 days at 20-25 C in an air-conditioned chamber. More than 20 viruliferous aphids were transferred to each of 3-6 receptor plants. The receptor plants were healthy Madam Vinous sweet orange or rough lemon seedlings 6 to 12 months old. The inouclation feeding period was 48 hr or more at 20-25 C in an air-conditioned chamber. After each inoculation. plants were sprayed with insecticide to eliminate the vectors. Virus sources. The virus source Enzyme-linked immunosorbent plants and all other plants for experiassay (ELISA). Double antibody ments were maintained in vector-free sandwich @AS) ELISA with polyelonal antibody (PAb) was used to verify Contribution Fruit Trees Res. Sta. B-168. CTV infection in the receptor plants 2
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 365
影响因子:
--
作者:
Hirasawa;A
通讯作者:
A