Body mass estimation for circum-Pacific Asian people based on somatometric data
Body mass estimation for circum-Pacific Asian people based on somatometric data
复制标题
基于体测数据的环太平洋亚洲人体重估算
DOI：
10.1002/ajhb.23510
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Wataru Takigawa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Emma Hinako Moritoshi;Midori Matsuoka;Gen Kume;Shinichi Dewa and Tomoki Sunobe;三浦収・金谷弦・中井静子・伊藤萌・千葉聡;菊池 泰弘;齋藤誠二，入口舜太，石川静香，佐々木新介;Wataru Takigawa
目的通过测量身高和双嵴宽来估计体重的多元回归方法。然而，这些指标主要来自欧洲人、非洲人和印度-地中海人，而中纬度亚洲人并没有得到广泛的反映。因此，环太平洋亚洲人的新的估计公式的设计，并使用原始的个人data.Materials和MethodsTargeting亚洲人在传统社会或20世纪60年代之前，进行多元回归分析（MRA）与体重为目标变量，身高，体宽，和产品的头长/宽（HLBpr）作为解释变量。目标人群被分为四个气候组，并为每个性别或组合的sexuals. ResultsMRA身高和体宽在许多公式中表示显着的多重相关系数（R）。在四个气候组中，温带组的R值最高。在东亚/东南亚人群中，身高和HLBpr在MRA中超过0.8。用19-世纪日本男性的原始数据替代，温带组公式误差最小，所有使用体宽的公式误差均<2 kg.ConclusionsAs body mass index variable significantly dependent on some climate factors，估计公式混合各种气候组是不可取的，因为误差大。对于中纬度亚洲人，温带群体公式预计误差较小;然而，在体重不足个体比例原本很高的群体中，任何公式都倾向于高估。
ObjectivesMultiple regression approaches for estimating body mass by somatometry typically use stature and biiliocristal breadth. However, these measures were obtained largely from Europeans, Africans, and Indo‐Mediterraneans, whereas mid‐latitude Asians were not broadly reflected. Thus, new estimation formulas for circum‐Pacific Asians were devised, and the accuracy was evaluated using raw individual data.Materials and MethodsTargeting Asians in the traditional society or before the 1960s and performing multiple regression analysis (MRA) with body weight as the objective variable, and stature, body breadth, and product of head length/breadth (HLBpr) as explanatory variables. The target population was divided into four climate groups, and the formulas were prepared for each sex or the combined‐sexes.ResultsThe MRA by stature and body breadth indicated significant multiple correlation coefficients (R) in many formulas.Rwas higher in the combined‐sexes. Among the four climate groups, the temperate group showed the highestR. In the East/Southeast Asians,Rexceeded 0.8 in the MRA by stature and HLBpr. Substituting the raw data of 19th‐century Japanese males, the temperate group formulas presented the least error, and the error in all the formulas using body breadth was <2 kg.ConclusionsAs body mass index varies significantly depending on some climatic factors, estimation formulas mixed with various climate groups are not desirable because of the large errors. For the mid‐latitude Asians, the temperate group formulas are expected to have a smaller error; however, in the group where the proportion of underweight individuals was originally high, any formula tends to be overestimated.