The possibilities and limits of impact and engagement in research on military institutions
The possibilities and limits of impact and engagement in research on military institutions
复制标题
影响和参与军事机构研究的可能性和局限性
作者：
Woodward R
军事地理研究通常需要与军事机构直接接触。尽管这种契约的道德性经常受到争论，但实践中契约的细节却很少受到仔细审查。审查很重要，因为军事交战可以形成研究衍生的批评，并可以影响研究成果在军事和学术研究界的交流。军事接触包括与军事人员和机构以文本、表征和人际模式交流有关军事活动和现象的数据、理论和概念。本文考察了地理学研究参与的历史，以展示围绕这个看似简单的想法的复杂性和争论。然后介绍了一个研究项目和更广泛的研究计划，英国武装部队储备，提供了经验背景，从中我们得出我们对军事接触的观察。然后，我们考虑两个问题，语言和制度文化，以了解军事接触的复杂性。我们通过考虑当代关键军事地理研究中的参与政治来结束。
Military geographical research often requires direct engagement with military institutions. Although the morality of such engagements is often debated, the details of engagement in practice have been less scrutinised. Scrutiny is important, as military engagements can shape research‐derived critiques and can influence the communication of research outcomes to both military and academic research communities. Military engagement comprises the communication of data, theories, and concepts about military activities and phenomena, with military personnel and institutions, in textual, representational, and interpersonal modes. The paper examines Geography's history of research engagement to show the complexities and debates around this seemingly straightforward idea. It then introduces a research project and wider research programme on the UK armed forces reserves which provides the empirical context from which we draw our observations about military engagement. We then consider two issues, language and institutional cultures, for their insights into the complexities of military engagement. We conclude by considering the politics of engagement in contemporary critical military geographical research.
登录
查看更多内容
“基于证据的政策”和刑事司法系统的政府——只有在证据合适的情况下！
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
M. Naughton
通讯作者：
M. Naughton
军事化、耻辱和抵抗：在平民工作场所谈判预备役军人身份
影响因子：
--
作者：
Higate P
通讯作者：
Higate P
性别专家和挑剔的朋友：邻近关系研究
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Aiko Holvikivi
通讯作者：
Aiko Holvikivi
影响因子：
3
作者：
Sergio Catignani;Victoria M. Basham
通讯作者：
Sergio Catignani;Victoria M. Basham
作为研究实践的迭代并行性：拥抱学术和日常政治的话语不可通约性
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Olivia R. Williams;Joseph Pierce
通讯作者：
Joseph Pierce