INFORMATION IN WRONG RESPONSES TO THE RAVEN PROGRESSIVE MATRICES
INFORMATION IN WRONG RESPONSES TO THE RAVEN PROGRESSIVE MATRICES
复制标题
对乌鸦渐进矩阵错误反应的信息
DOI：
10.1111/j.1745-3984.1976.tb00011.x
复制
发表时间：
1976
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
D. Thissen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Thissen
参加测试的人不太可能选择乌鸦递进矩阵项目的不正确替代项。Sigel(1963)分析了递进矩阵的几个项目上的错误模式，发现被选为错误回答的备选方案中存在性别和年龄差异，但错误模式与测试总分之间没有关系。Jacobs和Vandeventer(1970)将对累进矩阵的不正确反应分为“高级”(部分正确)反应和“其他”反应。作者发现，在18个案例中，有9个案例的“上级”反应比例与测试总分呈正相关，作者得出结论，在测试中的错误选择中可以获得额外的信息
The incorrect alternatives to the items of the Raven Progressive Matrices are not equally likely to be chosen by individuals taking the test. Sigel (1963) analyzed the patterns of errors on several items of the Progressive Matrices and found sex and age differences in the alternatives chosen as the wrong response, but found no relationship between error patterns and total score on the test. Jacobs and Vandeventer (1970) categorized the incorrect responses on the Progressive Matrices as "superior" (partially correct) responses and "other." Finding that the proportion of "superior" responses in 9 out of 18 cases correlated positively with the total score on the test, the authors concluded that additional information is available in the incorrect choices on the