“The Fragments, Scraps, the Bits and Greasy Relics”: Shakespeare and the Eighteenth-Century Poetic Miscellany
“The Fragments, Scraps, the Bits and Greasy Relics”: Shakespeare and the Eighteenth-Century Poetic Miscellany
复制标题
“碎片、碎片、碎片和油腻的遗迹”：莎士比亚和十八世纪诗学杂记
DOI：
10.1215/00982601-3695918
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
0.1
通讯作者：
Christopher Salamone
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Christopher Salamone
翻译后摘要：本文旨在增加细微差别的故事莎士比亚的册封在十八世纪，一个故事，迄今忽视了这一时期的诗歌miseries发挥的作用。在世纪里，这种非常流行的文学形式在形式、数量和选择上是否有模式？虽然这篇文章研究了一些文本，但它也对一个特定的集合进行了更有针对性的分析，即《可交换的品种》（1717），从中我们可以得出更广泛的结论。《杂录》中有八个“断句”。这些摘录中的一些被认为是莎士比亚的作品，另一些则是改编和修改的结果，还有一些则根本没有出处。这告诉了我们什么关于莎士比亚在这个选编时刻的文化消费和同化？这些文字遗存体现了怎样的文化需求和文化态度？更一般地说，这是如何适应更广泛的模式，莎士比亚的片段，在这一时期的其他诗歌missiles流通，这揭示了什么建设的“莎士比亚”作为一个受人尊敬的文本存在的文学市场？
Abstract:This article seeks to add nuance to the story of Shakespeare’s canonization in the eighteenth century, a story that has hitherto neglected the part played by the period’s poetic miscellanies. Are there patterns in the form, quantity, and selection of Shakespearean texts within this hugely popular literary form over the century? Whilst the article examines a number of texts, it also offers a more focused analysis of one particular collection, The Agreeable Variety (1717), from which we can draw wider conclusions. The miscellany contains eight “Shakespearean” fragments. Some of these extracts are firmly attributed to Shakespeare, others are the consequence of adaptation and revision, and some have no provenance at all. What does this tell us about the cultural consumption and assimilation of Shakespeare at this moment of anthologizing? What cultural needs and attitudes do these textual relics realize? And more generally, how does this fit in the wider pattern of Shakespearean fragments that circulated in the period’s other poetic miscellanies, and what does this reveal about the construction of “Shakespeare” as an esteemed textual presence on the literary market?