Intentionality and irony
Intentionality and irony
复制标题
意向性和讽刺性
DOI：
10.1075/pbns.231.04att
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Attardo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Attardo
本文提出了两个中心观点：第一，反讽是一个典型的，也许是范例的范畴，有一些类型的反讽比其他类型的反讽更中心。第二种观点认为，反讽的加工和产生主要是潜意识的，其意义是不确定的。反语和反语加工理论的影响进行了研究。此外，存在的罐头或惯用的讽刺促进自动/潜意识的处理。本文假设了一些关于反语的事实，这些事实在其他地方进行了详细的讨论。我还假设，无需进一步讨论，我在Attardo（2000）中提出的反语模型，可以概括为：一个反语情境是一个六元组（S，H，C，u，p，p）。
The paper makes two central claims: the first is that irony a prototypical and perhaps exemplar category, there are some types of irony that are more central than others. The second claim is that irony is processed and produced largely subconsciously and that its meaning is indeterminate. Implications for the theory of irony and irony processing are examined. Furthermore, the existence of canned or idiomatic irony facilitates automatic/subconscious processing. This paper assumes a number of facts about irony, which are discussed at length elsewhere. I also assume, without further discussion, the model of irony I presented in Attardo (2000), which can be summarized as follows: an ironical situation is a sextuple (S, H, C, u, p, p).